Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Thank you Guys for fixing up the listTechnically, yes. Practically, unlikely.
If I or we find any error we will let it know.
Is there anyway to have 2 sf hospitals? One with the rpg and 1 with the m203?
Oh right. Yeah, my memory was a little fuzzy there. Thanks for clarifying. I recall removing that railing and the playerblocks as a result of a poll since it was an engine-level issue, not a map issue. I do recall the RPG change as well, though that was done before the railing was removed I think. Man. Talk about blast from the past.I do think the railing was never originally there. But it was added to fix people on West Wing Roof being invisible. But if I recall correctly, people kept complaining. Which is why it was ultimately removed again.
Hi folks,I've now added the number of slots per map to the list of map names:
Can u guys tell me, which maps are more then 26 slots?
Do you guys have a list of them?
thank you!
Although, I can't seem to find it in game so it's possible it wasn't ever included in any of the updates due to redundancy.The current version of SF Hospital does have the full 32 slots as far as I'm aware. It also removes the 203s and brings back the RPG from the beginning of the map. And it fixes (or at least attempts to do so) an issue with West Wing Roof (if I recall correctly).
Maybe I'm misreading things. But OP doesn't mention server manager anywhere, just the regular client?You're right - I missed that. The specific fix was for the server side setup. I just recalled the specific issue of "Failed to verify vital components" and a solution for it and assumed it'd be the same issue. So that's my bad.
I just mean the regular client and it fails at step 1Sorry for the confusion - I assumed the above fix was for the client and didn't check the details.
Unfortunately it now gives me an error saying installation failed at step 1 and I made sure to delete the 1kbWhen does it say that? At which step?
program.
Joe retrieved the name from a public chat related to AA. So the name was already provided and it was already public which means there cannot be a expectation of privacy. And can you publicly provide something that is already publicly available? Perhaps, but it's debatable.You are plain wrong.
What isn't debatable is that using the exact definition of that Wikipedia quote means that it is doxxing to introduce a friend to other people at a party without getting their consent first.
But I think it is clear that neither situation falls under the intended meaning of doxxing.
Help keep Assist going. Donate to cover our server costs.
