31
Support / Assist on Windows 8.1
« on: Sunday, May 11, 2014, 06:07:06 AM »
I just got a new tablet/notebook and was trying to see if I could install Assist on it.
Here's the one I got:
http://www.asus.com/in-search-of-incredible/us-en/asus-transformer-book-t100/
Now I tried installing Assist and here's the result when trying to join a server:
Now I updated c++ as well as .net framework, but it's still the same. I also tried updating my video drivers but they seemed to be up to date.
I also did reset+repair on Assist's Install tabs a couple of times (it downloaded new stuff but the problem persisted)
I always ran Assist as admin.
The same happens when I run armyops.exe separetely (as admin again).
The default is to run armyops.exe in compatibilty mode for Windows 7, but I also tried Windows XP compatibilty mode as well as without compatibility mode, always the same results.
I read up on the error and apparantly it's:
Thanks in advance to anyone who can help
teddy
Here's the one I got:
http://www.asus.com/in-search-of-incredible/us-en/asus-transformer-book-t100/
Now I tried installing Assist and here's the result when trying to join a server:
Now I updated c++ as well as .net framework, but it's still the same. I also tried updating my video drivers but they seemed to be up to date.
I also did reset+repair on Assist's Install tabs a couple of times (it downloaded new stuff but the problem persisted)
I always ran Assist as admin.
The same happens when I run armyops.exe separetely (as admin again).
The default is to run armyops.exe in compatibilty mode for Windows 7, but I also tried Windows XP compatibilty mode as well as without compatibility mode, always the same results.
I read up on the error and apparantly it's:
Quote from: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/125749
This error occurs when your application indirectly calls a pure virtual member function in a context where a call to the function is not valid. In most cases, the compiler detects this and reports the error when building the application. But depending on how your code is written, sometimes the problem is detected only at run-time.
The error occurs when you indirectly call a pure virtual function within the context of a call to the constructor or destructor of an abstract base class. This is illustrated in the sample code below, along with some more description.
Thanks in advance to anyone who can help
teddy