15
« on: Saturday, February 21, 2026, 15:44:31 PM »
I do understand your stance. And it is indeed frustrating that due to the limited size of the community, there are not too many servers available and often even fewer server owners. And because of that, a user's ability to play the game can (effectively) be down to the whims of a few individuals.
However, what we need to understand is that it's (generally) their server. They can regulate it how they want (within certain reasonable constaints, of course). We (the 25Assist team) do encourage keeping servers open and not banning people due to personal grudges and other subjective reasons. However, we're unlikely to intefere in these situations. We simply don't have the standing to do so.
I suppose the way to better manage this would be what the US Army did. To centralise the server ecosystem and only allow certain servers in our server lists (however one would curate them). However, we (25Assist / aao25.com) are in no legal position to be doing this. This game still belongs to the US Army. We help make the game playable, but don't try to levy undue influence on it (for the most part at least - and especially lately).
Again, I'm sorry you've been frustrated by the situation you've come back to. I wish the community saw the value of having a diverse (read: large) set of players even if some of them - compared to the ones in charge of the servers - are more skilled than the ones, or have different politcal views, or sexual orientation, or wear their wedding ring on the wrong finger, or have something else arbitrarily different about them. But that's saddly not the world we live in.