Forum

I am not sure why you are posting those ban appeals Gunman. Yaya has been good friends with Joe for at least 20 years. A good amount of oR still hangs out and with Joe being the noob that he is, he never mentioned that he still plays AA until confusion told us back in September. Epic, Scarface, and I were all immediately interested and decided to come back. I was the first to download but the next day Joe was banned for using a first name and Epic and Scarface said they didn't want to play after that although they have since recanted and said they will give it a try after Joe gets unbanned.

As I mentioned before, Johnny from Audigy/iog will also play with us and those guys all keep in contact a bunch of old AA players (Epic talks to like a 100 himself) so unbanning Joe could easily have a domino effect and lead to an AA renaissance so that we don't have nights that we have often had lately where our AA play is restricted of 1 hour of single digit players before everyone leaves. I am enjoying playing AA again but I would enjoy it more with more people especially with old friends.

Anyways, if he doesn't change, you can always ban him again and hopefully for a better reason than using someone's first name which I have seen many other people do, including admins.

PS I don't see any reference to you in that screenshot Gunny unless you refuse to apologize which is not my experience with you.

Joe retrieved the name from a public chat related to AA. So the name was already provided and it was already public which means there cannot be a expectation of privacy. And can you publicly provide something that is already publicly available? Perhaps, but it's debatable.

What isn't debatable is that using the exact definition of that Wikipedia quote means that it is doxxing to introduce a friend to other people at a party without getting their consent first.

But I think it is clear that neither situation falls under the intended meaning of doxxing.