Forum

You sick son of a [MOD EDIT] spanky, how can u eat that [MOD EDIT] with so much salt?

It's good tasting salt and good for you. AJ, nice things eh? Costco

Don't be a wasteful noob. Buy quality the first time and take care of it. What's wrong with your laptop?

Also, this isn't site feedback.

Delta, you bring up a lot of good questions. While I wouldn't call myself smart or all-knowing, I know a couple of unique things and I can reason so I'll try to explain at least some of the things you've mentioned. Also we can talk about God and we can talk about evolution but again neither of us can undeniably prove one way or another. We can just explain and understand.

So all we really have to go on is the Bible.

Observations as well for evolution. I'll tell you why I don't trust the Bible. If it was written on total truth (I'll cover this in a sec), it had to have been translated and altered. I highly doubt it was originally written as it exists today. I do realize that revisions happen and people's accounts can be added to the original version but who verifies those accounts? Today, knowledge can go through a lot of checks to make sure it's accurate. Now to the truth part, with our developed brains it can get very lonely thinking that we live such a emotional and far-reaching life and then when we die, that's it. I'll admit, that's pretty hard to swallow and it flat out sucks. I wish I could live forever but that's not possible as our bodies age but spiritually (totally bogus word) it would be nice to have my mind forever. It seems highly possible to me that the Bible is fiction. People getting depressed, thinking there's no real reason to live and it doesn't matter what you do in your life (especially way back then). Now wait, people start saying that there's this guy that walked the earth and spoke of God. Now you have purpose, now you should do good and lead a good life, appreciate your maker and fellow man. I think the Bible can give people purpose, in fact I know it does. It's not a bad thing at all but it's gotten a little out of hand. Saying that there's a reason to live and a reason to do good, that's great but it's too complex now. It's conflicting science and doing things it was never intended to do.[/quote]

Does the theory of evolution make sense to me, yes, somewhat. But there are still many things left to theory. Like how life began, no one really knows because no one was there.

How life began... I can't tell you, I just don't know for sure. However there's a pretty good idea of it here: http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=3717
Summarized:
From what I understand, when the Earth was just forming, it was a hot core, the surface had cooled a bit in some areas forming rock along side of water and other elements. There were a lot more asteroids, rocks and whatnot floating around in space and Earth didn't really have it's atmosphere 100% yet. So gravity doing what it does, pulls these rocks in. With the atmosphere just forming, there's less friction so you get a faster velocity from one of those rocks. Now I can't remember what elements are needed but heat and energy is part of it which is what a rock brings when it's flying towards Earth. Anyway, you get the right elements smashing together and get this, you get an Amino Acid. Amino acids (building blocks of life) have been produced in lab experiments simulating the shock of a meteor impact. Deep sea Black Smoker Chimneys produce very high pressure(deep sea pressures) very hot (volcanic vents) mineral rich (sulfur compounds) environments protected from UV rays by thousands of feet of water. Energy provided by heat and,later, chemosynthesis. This is the perfect environment for bio-genesis.

And there's still the really complex fact of how something knows it needs to change? What prompts these changes, and how are they so perfect in their design? How does evolution know that in order to fight gravity, you need an equal and opposite reaction, which comes from the flapping of wings? Is evolution intelligent, does it remember what works and what doesn't?

Nothing knows it needs to change. I can explain it like this; certain athletes have certain larger muscles. Football players can have big legs, baseball players have big arms and such. This is the building of muscle. This is 1 generation. Imagine that baseball player's son playing baseball and his son and his son's son. Keep going for a few hundred or thousand years or maybe more. Because they use their arms more, you would see differences starting to appear. For example, larger veins/arteries to power the muscles. Larger bones to handle the force. Maybe even longer arms. Repetitive actions, the need to do something and pushing your body to the limit in order to accomplish that is basically evolution. A couple hundred generations after that initial baseball player and you might see the latest "revision" as naturally growing large arms, even if he doesn't play baseball. It's the same reason why people can be genetically tall, short, have larger or smaller features. There was a need and over many generations that need now has an attribute. Again, this isn't racist but I have to touch on the white vs black thing again. We are white because our skin needed to absorb more sunlight since we started moving out of Africa into higher latitudes where there, by location, is less sun. We are white because we evolved. Black people haven't because they live in Africa still. Some were brought over for slavery and that's why we see so many established (several generations of) black people in America.

For flight and formation of wings it could be something as simple as webbing between fingers. Wing structures in bats are very similar to hands. A bat looks similar to a bird so there you go. For initial flight, you could assume an animal wanted to jump from tree to tree or something. As it did that more and more (like the flying squirrel), the squirrels or whatever animal that had abnormally larger quantities of webbing would be better, thus natural selection kicks in and more and more of them have more and more webbing.

Why did that amino acid that arrived on that meteor so long ago choose to change? What made it change? What was the influence on it to grow into what is now everything that is alive? Why are there still simple organisms if evolution is always bettering things? We depend on things like bacteria more than people know, why haven't they evolved into something as complex as a human yet. Did evolution see that we needed something to stay as a simple as a bacteria?

Pretty good question. I don't know the answer and I can't think of a logical answer. It could just be that they don't have a need to change or can't change.

Maybe things only evolve when they need to, but how do they know when they need to? They don't have a complex brain like a human, and even a human can barely adapt to changes in the environment. Something has to prompt these changes.

I think you're right on the first part but the second I already went over. Nothing knows it needs to change, it just knows the limits of it's body. Evolution doesn't drive, it's being driven by the needs of the animal, repetitive movements and a lot of time.

If I chop my arm off, and my children's children do the same, will we eventually gain the ability to regrow that arm? Will our bodies get the point overtime? Arms are critical to survival, so I would assume, under the theory of evolution, that eventually we would gain the ability to grow said arm back.

It seems possible. Maybe that's how other animals did it. Maybe a lot of those lizards (are they lizards, I can't remember the animal that does that) got pecked at by birds and whatnot and while they could survive with 3 limbs, things would be a lot better if they had the original 4. This may be a case of a problem mutation that was actually beneficial and not the cause of physical harm.

It all seems too easy. Over countless years we evolve, yeah got that part. The most that has changed in humans over the last 2000 years, has been are ability to share knowledge. I wouldn't call that evolving in the context that evolution would present. More like, since America, the world has taken leaps and bounds.

What needs to be changed? Sure there's human wants like wings and an extra arm or something but it's not crucial to survival nor do we stress the need for a new feature over several generations. I'm sure we still evolve but probably not that much. You don't know if we have or haven't changed in the last 2000 years.

So is evolution all knowing? How does it know what gravity is? How does it know how to counteract its forces? What defines a wing? And how did evolution over countless years seem to figure out what took humans, that have an actual brain, thousands of years to figure out?

What took us thousands of years to figure out?

Evolution to me suggests the presences of an intelligent force be it a god, or what have you. I don't know, Spanky, tell me how evolution figures this stuff out? And how does it know when its figured it out?

Yea it still can I guess. It's hard to describe but evolution isn't a force or a power, evolution is a need for change.

How does it figure out how to wire a brain?

It doesn't. The brain probably started off small, an automatic way to regulate necessary systems such as the heart and lungs and it grew from there.

in the end it doesn't matter which one I believed in, because I'll be dead.

Yup.

Well yea, look at DDR2 and DDR3. Higher capacity and faster speed, same size really. I know I've seen 64GB CompactFlash cards so why not put a little more research into that. The flash doesn't need to be writable which should make it cheaper.

i love it when people who dont beleive in the bible call us narrow minded

Where did I say "us" (christians?) were narrow minded? I said you were. I'm not saying you're (or your religion is) wrong either, that would be wrong of me. I just think there's a lot of people that follow it blindly without knowing much else. It can be downright scary to form an opinion on something while only knowing one side of the argument.

Anyway, ever hear about the peppered moth?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppered_moth#Evolution
Oh my xxx, Wikipedia can't be trusted, use this:
http://animals.about.com/cs/evolution/a/aa090901a.htm

To be honest, I don't know a whole lot about how a capacitor works or what chemicals they have inside. I should read about it... so many things to do =\

No it doesn't. Climate changes slowly, about on the path that evolution would follow (makes sense for evolution to follow close to that). When climate DOES change fast, yea species and vegetation are wiped out, it happens. Animals don't need to evolve in 1 day to catch prey, because an uncatchable prey doesn't just magically appear and there are things to eat besides the un-catchable prey. Also, if the prey evolves tactics, the predator can obviously see that and evolve as well, just many steps behind.

Adaptation isn't putting on a coat...
Check the definition of mutation.

You seem narrow-minded, try to open up a bit, maybe learn some more about what goes on in the world. I'm not talking about learning about evolution, I'm not going to shove a "theory" down your throat but animals behaviors are facts, there's no arguing that.

Let's be careful not to say "GOD IS RIGHT" or "evolution is 100% factual". Ok?

Adaptation isn't different, it is a crucial part to evolution. Look up the definition of "mutation" from a non-biased (no God or evolution sites) source and you'll see that it is a negative "process".

I don't see how that quote gets anyone anywhere. Valve sizes can change in size to allow flow. Think about a garden hose then think about a fire truck hose. Bit of a difference in terms of GPM.