755
« on: Tuesday, December 29, 2009, 20:29:35 PM »
There is almost no point to instigate a regime driven by population control hypothesis when the scenario is already this big and uncontrolled. When we talk about something as relative as human population, we need to look to numbers and statistics so a fundamental judgement can be passed on real evidence. Not only that; we also need to understand wether such a regime would be beneficial to each as an individual, as a country, as a certain civilization or even a whole continent for that matter.
To implement such thing in Europe would most likely provoke a revolution down the road; as it was unnecessary and uncalled for. Why? Because Europe/Europeans already automatically establish a control over it, simply by existing in dangerous places and whatnot. Same goes for America; even with couples having three kids, America --if we don't count on the immigrants-- is still fairly consistent on its population growth/death.
China used to be a massacre. Things are getting better now, but are still completely off the charts in comparison to the rest of the world. A tad less controlled, or none controlled for that matter; are Africa and India -both on the biggest population increase charts- Africa tends to remain amended due to the huge impact of Malaria and the many other diseases that lie within. India is fruited down with terrorism acts and the likes.
But; with the gigantic rate of immigration coming from this countries/continents, things become hardly controllable.
The wankers just love to make sex and have never heard of it provoking pregnancy, somehow.
Show Posts
