Forum

Hello,

I think that all large gravitational fields would be round eventually.

I also think that any object with even a small gravitational field would retain some form of atmosphere, the composition and density would be what mattered.

Steve

Hello,

This is what I have been waiting for  muahhahaha.

EDITED

Steve so you can make cliams but dont have to back them up. Come on steve I know your better than that.
That is a total cop out.

Look at your first line, and then think.

Did I "cop" out or did I supply the rope?

And too answer you less sarcasticly (  ) the big bang and or the existence of a supreme being/s are all theories, there is no proof.

Steve

Hello,

At least Gays exist, god does not.

Steve

Hello,

Until every country and every culture brings all laws in to one universal version, there will be trouble.

In the UK it is illegal to have sex under 16, so all I need to do is travel to another country to have sex with someone under 16. Does that make me a pedophile?

Steve

Hello,

At first I though you just didn't like that the company fired him for his views, but your first strawman sentence makes it seem like you're also against gay marriage as well.
"I have a different opinion than you" could be used to justify any bad viewpoints or behavior. Where is the line? I'd say it's at equal rights for all humans, but apparently you disagree, despite having no logical argument to back up your view. Why are you even here debating if you're not going to provide anything other than meaningless phrases such as "No two people will ever have exactly the same views on everything" What's the point?


As far as privacy goes, how is this even a privacy situation? When you show your support for a public movement, that's a public act. A private act would be telling a friend or family member. If it was actually private, nobody would know, unless a family member or friend leaked it.
Regardless, when you're a CEO, nothing you do is private. It's the same as if you're a sports star or a celebrity. It's to be expected. He knew what he was getting into, it's the life of a public figure. It might not be right, but that's life, and life never has been, and never will be fair.
The bottom line was his stance on this issue had a chance to have a negative effect on the company. This kind of thing happens A LOT, but is only getting attention now because it has to do with gay marriage.

Where too start, I am not against marriage, I am against the law being changed over time.

The first line of my post was sarcasm, where does the changing of the law end?

Will, eventually, people be able to marry an inanimate object?

The point is that no two people have the exact same views on everything, so why get rid of the CEO because one view does not match someone else.

It is not equal rights for all humans. This CEO who is a human lost his rights to have a personal opinion.

Of course this is a privacy issue. The CEO did this privately not in the companies name. He was doing what he thought was right.

Not even mentioning that weed is less harmfull than tabacco and alcohol as far as I know.

So you don't think a mind altering drug will effect driving skills then?

I also want to point out that is have used Firefox for a very long time, and still do. Not because I agree with their politics or views, but because I started out on Netscape before Internet Explorer.

Steve

Hello,

Believe it or not, I am not an "ist" person. I don't see color, sex/orientation, age, disability or religion.

What I am is someone who hates it when someone says "Your only saying/doing that because I am [ red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet, black or white / male, female, straight, gay or bi / any age / disabled / what ever religion or not ]"

Things that may change in the law and why.

Age of consent. Because people want it to change.
How people can be married at one time. Because people want it to change.

I am only using those two currently, but there are more. The "people" who want these things to change might be you, they might be me or they could be someone else. I already cover the age of consent.

Number of people allowed to be married. Most "White" cultures agree on two people being married, whilst a lot of "Non-white" cultures like one husband and many wives. There is discrimination a plenty here. First off, I had to use the colors too make a point, but I do know that the same applies the other way around sometimes. But here is the bigger discrimination, 1 husband and many wives! Why not 1 wife and many husbands?

Steve

Hello,

At 49 years old, I think that as you get older you understand why there is an age of consent. You might think or know at 15 what you want, but it changes as you get older. You also have to think about this, when do your parents stop taking responsibility for your actions.

"The age of concent" has nothing to do with you agreeing to have sex or not. It is the age that the society you live in says it is legal to have sex. Rape ( a crime I consider worse than murder ) or pedophilia ( which I think is worse than rape ) should be punished very hard.

I am not an American, I am English. We let people drive at 17, when we think they are sensible enough, guess why I think 17 is a good age for sex now.

Steve

Hello,

Thank you for that.

Although I don't have the time to play as I want, it is nice to be able too if I wish.

Steve