Forum

@ Delta: It's sarcasm. You should know better; considering for how long we've talked.
@ Nate: Get that flight over my way, you sexy one!

FYI, on the 16th Rockstar is releasing I think 2 expansions for GTA4, pretty exciting.

Keep us updated with your awesome videos and images!  :-*

It just happened that I had a little extra time, and could devote myself to this corner on the internet I deeply love.
Out of jokeness, this seriously is a place I like a lot --most likely because of the people on it.

Always glad to contribute somehow;
I've also got to prove my GM title worthwhile.

As a curious lad, I am interested in knowing whether you like colour over BW, or the other way around. If it is not asking much, I would also like you to explain what interests you more, and how heavily that may or may not affect your preference towards either. If I see interest arise in the subject at hand, I might as well turn this onto a more profound discussion addressing some key differences between colour and BW and how Photography itself tends to affect our vision of the world.

As for me; I can't quietly pick one over the other and let it pass under without pinning out that:
Colour ---is photography played as a game of density and visually-attended emotion vibrancy.
BW ---is photography circumstanced as a game of forms, existence vs. null, act vs. react.

With that in mind, the decision of either is bound to relate to your character, almost fully. Which ever option you en-glad the most, will always give away a bit of yourself. Personally, I think it's good that it does. Having that said, and time running out of my fists, my pick would have to go with Black and White, I am afraid.

Off to your side lads, off'em go.

What ever the argument was once based on, Knight is now -most certainly- taking the lead.
Delta is a fine sir with impeccable communications skills. As true as that may be, there comes a point where discussions with him meet a dead end. I am not implying Delta is factually dumb or lacks of further knowledge as per the subject in-discussion; simply that his theoretical views are, in many ways, self-shading and self-censoring. For the most part, the existence of limited liberty in one's opinions --or the lack of, for that matter-- inevitably abruptly affects it's value downwards. What could have been a ever-lasting yet interesting discussion, soon enough, becomes otherwise due to the lack of belief and trust put into the usual "thinking out of the box".

At the end;
Knight will always win, unless Delta does too.

(Wait, what?)

It looks alright on my screen.
I've clicked it, and will keep doing so once a day or so;

Hope it helps, frankly speaking.

This Dann boy here is getting inactive again.

Got a tremendously hard-working week ahead of me, and University interview at the end of it.

Needless to say, it is time I concentrate the most and finish my portfolio.

As that finishes, I will be flying off to Portugal and enjoy some holidays.

I'll try to come in and check on you, if I can.

Regards and all good for y'all.

No one replies much to anyone in these forums, expect to Nate.

Gotta learn to deal with that.

I'll check the video and comment afterwards, I guess.