Forum

Haha, you're linking to a picture. If that's evidence enough for you, I can give you one where I'm on the moon.

EDIT:
And looking at the first entry if searching the web (rather than for pictures), I can find:And that's from a religious point of veiw.

You were clearly told to do your own research.  But you and almost everyone else has selective reading.

I guess we're on climate change now? Not sure why people still deny it's a thing. It's quite humorous.
Here's some links that may interest you vegeta. I don't have to time to properly search into this but a quick search showed plenty of results for climate change support. Some of these are public and free articles. I do have access to many scientific articles from academic and professional peer reviewed journals but unfortunately a lot of them are behind a pay wall and I only have access to them from being a University of Michigan student so not able to link anything substantial. But if it's just the amount of people agreeing with climate change you want, take a look at all of these scientific articles. Sure you can actually read most of them, but the abstract describes what they're about.

http://www.sciencemag.org/search?site_area=sciencejournals&y=0&fulltext=climate%20change&x=0&journalcode=sci&journalcode=sigtrans&journalcode=scitransmed&submit=yes

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/
http://climate.nasa.gov/

If you don't trust US government sites.

http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/306/5702/1686.full

I'll also give you an except from that last link

What a joke Killaman now decides he wants to come in and have a serious conversation. Because He seems to think that he knows something on global warming/climate change. You have looked up a couple of on board siites that are slanted to the goverments agenda. heard about it all in school. You singed up aswell because the "scientists said so" Go and do some reasearch of your own and once you have a balenced view come back and tell us both sides until you know both sides go away and dont expect me to read that tripe until YOU know what your talking about. You had nothing but scorn for both my topics and now you really expect me to look up this perpaid dung lol. Open your eyes. And dont do what the school told you.

Climate is a vastly more complex system then temperature. So obviously a significant increase in temprature can change other aspects of the climate, which in turn can - without a doubt - result in a reduction in temperature.
I didn't read any of the links Killa put up, but I'd bet some of them also talk about how exactly this happens.

However, I'll give you an easy example. You know, when the Earth got struck with an asteroid (or meteor? I don't really know) some 65 million years ago (when the dinosours were wiped out), the asteroid also brought a lot more energy to the earth, immense heat near where the asteroid landed (hence the glass that formed nearby). So temperature should have risen, right? No, because it also made these huge dust clouds that completely covererd the Earth from sunlight and thus made it colder (plus, of coure significantly lessened the oxygen being created). Of course this is just a simplification, but what it means is that it's not just about the one change you see at first site.
The reason I chose this example (while there are others), is because it's also a sudden change (even though infitely more sudden than what we're seeing right now in climate change).


Another thing I've been dying to discuss is your apparant hatred towards citations. I don't suppose you've been a part of a scientific research party? Or even read a scientific article, for that matter?
They are almost always composed of a lot of citations from other, earlier works. If you had to thurally explain every aspect of what you're doing in every article, all the articles would be 10 times longer and would take more than 10 times as long to write, because a lot of the things would need supporting experiments. You cannot do without citing other people's work.

The same should apply in here. Chances are, none of us will have seen evolution at a macro scale, because nobody claims it to work in one generation (and probably none, or very few of us, have scientificly observed it themselves), just as probably none us have themselves measured global warming as it's to do with climate change and climate is a sort of long term whether, the change of which can't be measured within one decade. But the same way, you did not see - let alone write - the actions in the bible. We're all just recollecting  (sometimes even citing) what we've seen others do.


OK, well let's try to talk on "topic" here.
Have you ever seen how the human embryo evolves in the uterus? It first looks like a fish and then starts forming more of a human shape. There are many stages of this transformation. It was taught to us in High School, and while I haven't seen it first hand, I have no reason to doubt the research done decades before my time.
Obviously the embryo won't have an "ape" shape, since that's such a small milestone in our evolution, however if this doesn't show that we evolved from another species, I don't know what would.

Ahh teddy what a little darling you are. So full of shit. You like wise decide ahh I know something about this subject I will have a go at Vegeta because he hurt me so bad I now have the ammo to come back and get him good. Lol Really lol. You do not deserve a responce. You totally trashed my threads. With no inteligence what so ever. You added nothing but trash talk. Then it got moved to the drama section. And now all of a sudden Oh Oh I know about this I want to play. Lol. But just in case anyone thinks aww Vegetas just running I will rip apart your first part and after that. Until you give me a decent responce you will get nothing out of me. You dont deserve it niether does this ignorant thread.

You said the dinos where whipped out about 65 million years ago. Wrong!!!
The dinos where not. And I dont mean your dates out by 10.20.30,40,50,60.5.4,3,2,or even 1 million years. Your dates are a complete lie ahd scientist have always lied about the dates of the dinos or there whole programme is wrong.

Here is a simple question you and every oe to look up for them selves.

If the dinos were whipped out approx 65 million years ago.
And if man evolved approx 200.000 years ago.
Heres the big one.
Why are there fossils of men and massive dinosaurs?
Answer that And I will continue. You pair are spouting shit as most poeple believe. Because you trust your goverments.
So if you or anyone else can answer this I will come back and destroy the rest of the shit you talk.

And heres a few examples incase your struggling with basic research.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=fossils+of+man+and+dinosaurs+together&site=webhp&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=2Aw2VfG2NM7laMyagKgL&ved=0CC0QsAQ&biw=1920&bih=1008

LOL Vegeta you said literally exactly what I expected/wanted you to say.

And did you tell anyone that so we would all no its true? Nope. nice try not.

I can't understand how anyone can really deny climate change. Lake temperatures are rising all over the globe, Arctic is melting, 99% of scientists agree... I mean, if nothing else maybe God is using climate change for an apocalyptic event right??

Dont suppose you would because your convinced your correct> so do you have any evidence of these 99% scientists? Were are these lakes that are rising? and by how much are they rising? and for how long have they been measuring these lakes?

scientistsSo if it's not real, why do so many scientists and others talk about it? Is it the big bad USA/EU trying to stifle development in China and India? Is it those pesky liberals trying to cut down energy corporation profits?[/quote]

 Why would usa and europe be concerned about the biggest devolping country in the world that buy all our rubbish waste etc. To stripe it and recycle it and sell it back to us. They out sold usa for car sales for the first time in history. And it will be repeated every following years for a very long time.
They provide most of the UKs material. The UK now produsces nothing any where near what they did in the past The country is on its knees.
Wonder if it because the UK closed its coal mines to help the ozone (LOL) whist China opens up two mines a week. What a joke  and hypocritcal pair of arse holes europe and the us are. If theres a hole in the ozone the usa and europe caused it. So suck it up china is ten times bigger in every department than usa. They will expaned at a fantastic rate. They dont look after there people health wise. So they make a far greater rate form there workers. Just like america and europe done in the past . Why are they concerd. Dont kid your self its about climate change lol.

Please dont for get the questions I asked you when you come back. Please provide some info on you post.

In the aftermath of this thread, the Drama and Spam board is a ghost town.

*clears throat*

Climate change is a serious friqqin' problem, something everyone needs to consider and address. By reacting and adapting to climate change, countless social problems can be solved.

Really? were is it? Keep in mind that it used to be called global warming. Why did they chamge the name to climate change?

Thanks teddy seems its different every where I go whys that?

I am making a minture jacket. Never made one before. Was involved in the full size versions. BP magnus was my first at 19 YO and then TLP for conoco, all the way up to the Elf Elgin. Worked in the blue room on the Elgin That was the best job I ever done. I will stick in some photos when its done.

Now see thats funny I love that