72
« on: Thursday, October 16, 2014, 17:59:59 PM »
You touched the very point why this "no-203" action and voting is mislead. While there can be _some_ (little but still) arguments against 203 at _spawn time_, there are _no_ reasonable arguments against 203 in general on this map. It would be like complaining against any other weapon. So basically there should be only "no-203 in 10/20/sec." discussion, if any. Because in my opinion, this is a matter that should be left in hands of admin servers.
Micro-management like that, and putting your hands into such details as particular weapons used on map, will not lead to anything good. Even the most dictator assist admin in history (I won't even mention his name, it was a real shame and pity) never even thought about messing with such local server rules.
Unfortunately, assist admins (mainly Eliz) have the attitude "let's make a vote, then implement it". And it is unfortunate, because the population driving the vote is neither representantive nor has good opinions that would lead to AAO2 growth. Sometimes it takes one man with a brain to make right decision, instead of throwing strange ideas and letting random people vote them.