Forum

Australia, where we land on the wrong beach but fight the cunts any way.

1. Wu-Tang Clan or Biggie Smalls?

The fact that you have started your response with an implying attribute to it almost makes me want to stop reading it right away, regardless...I never established an analogy. I interpreted your logic and applied it to what you may consider a more dramatised topic within our society terms, that is. This is to prove that:  A) Logics are more often than otherwise faulty when applied lightly to a subject we known as far as the average about.

You are talking about Economical Regulations, not about Economical Philosophies. I will be waiting for a more solid response on this.

In many countries, one person alone is sufficient to represent the whole nation. They call him/her The President. In all countries, there are certain groups to which all fall fit into. Be it age-wise, intelligence-wise, aspect-wise or any other, groups and categories are existent and take a huge role in defining a society under the terms that vise an understanding of a society. Whereas there is not one type of person that represents, or better applied, defines a society; there is indeed a group that outstands abundantly. Trends, mannerisms, addictions, behaviour patterns, common level of intelligence...all of these constitute a notion of Average.

Generalizations don't work and should only be used about Mexicans.

Or is this a simple case of rich people living boy/girl-hood dreams?