http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bass_reflex
Right, exactly what early 70's JBL speakers had. You're talking pure shit.
Yeah I couldn't remember that it was on the early 70's, but I knew they already had that bass reflex port, what I was saying is that all kinds of technology they invented to get better sounds, are always used in any kind of audio system, no matter if it has crap components or good components.
Listening to him is like looking at car audio specs claiming 5000watts of peak power written in bright red and other stupid shit. So the dude installs the lowest quality Gemini speakers that are at the same level as Pyle. Your pro audio buddy will know what I'm talking about. The dude claims he did so many "pro" installations and yada yada. Well, to make the story short, the system sounds terrible. There used to be some real nice vintage Zeniths and some ancient power amp. Those sounded great, but I wouldn't be surprised if some incompetent people hooked up stuff wrong when doing performances and blew something. Because I still don't know why the dude made the new sound installation.
Drop them in a situation where they are forever intimidated by intelligent people and they will change.
Well actually I don't care about car audio, never said they were top quality, they are made to have dirty power...
What I was saying is high fidelity speakers from nowadays are higher fidelity than the ones from the 80's, specially they all test them in computers, and a very very low margin of error, the speakers are canceled (that's how it works on current high quality models).
And I can say the same to all of you, can't discuss anything ether.
On forums all you can get from all the pros is:
-> Old bikes are better and more reliable;
-> Old cars are lot better;
-> Old airguns used to shoot better;
-> Old computers used to have better construction and would not break in a few time.
Well my answer to all of them is wrong, wrong, wrong. Newer good bikes are the top on reliability, have lot more efficiency, less dirty, more economics, same for the cars, and 60hp nowadays is lot different than a 60hp (on the cars, not bikes of 2strokes vs 4 strokes) from way back. Old airguns? Then they don't know airguns that kill huge boars.
Always had computers for a long time, all of them got broken very fast, and in fact the one that lasted long was from 2006, always 24\7 on until 2010. And what I used to pay for an old pc, it had pretty bad components, not much copper used at all, crappy heatsinks... Nowadays I have a 3slot GPU, lot's and lot's of aluminium, lot's of copper, freakin awesome build quality and very solid...
ps: Same goes with the sound, newer high fidelity amplifiers are ensured to make no distortions or noise in the signals, some you can put lot's of wattage power and near max volume and omg the speakers sound like they are off, nothing of noise...
WHATEVERWhere do you get your information? I'm talking purely from experience and knowledge I've learned through professional audio forums.
As I said creative don't actually reverse the compression, but what they do affects the music and in my opinion for better even if they are far away from high fidelity, I always loved their effects EAX...
About the speakers, there's a club here which is the most known of the entire island, they organize lot's of raves too with international dj's like carl cox and so... They use high fidelity speakers in their club, it's not to make loud, but to have high quality. But I still prefered a billion times when they even added some dirty power of a crazy HUGE subwoofer that they now have.
I also prefer home cinema and newer technology systems to the so called high fidelity full range ones from the studio. Y? Well because instead of having a coil that loses all it's power trying to reproduce all the frequencies, I prefer having lot's of speakers, each reproducing a certain frequency only and then with the addition of a subwoofer (+woofer 4 punch).
And my other reason is the high-fidelity speakers at very low volumes like 20db, 30db, don't sound powerfull, while with a subwoofer even at the lowest volume it make you think you still are hearing the punch and shake of the high fidelity speakers on high volume.
And since you guys are all sound engineers, go pick some amplifier schematics from one of the best amplifiers of the 80's or whatever... Buy the original, and remake it only using our top components of nowadays (equivalent ones), like solid capacitors, a thicker board with lot more conductivity, modern copper heatsink design with a fan.... modern high quality mosfet's or any other type of amp u wanna use...
And then come here and tell me which one has more noise in the sound waves, which one consume more, and which one heat more and finally the mix of all, which one has more efficiency? (yeah, think on that, and remember even if most companies just want money, there's always some who still enjoy making high quality products).
An example of a "not bad" hi-fi amplifier is this:

It's only 2 outputs and 180w of power, but this thing cost around 500€ (~658$). Why it cost so much for such low power and options? Well because it's construction is built the old way, but with good modern components, and this is not something near studio quality, but you can't say we don't have quality nowadays.
You can't compare this 500€ amp with only 180w to a cheap 1000w amplifier that cost 100€... What is good still cost a lot, like in the 80's, but back then you didn't have much cheap systems to buy.
ps: this is my opinion, so if you don't like it, I don't care, go buy your vintage speakers from the 80's or whatever you wanna buy, and I will be very happy with the modern high fidelity amplifiers.
Keep Cool