Forum

Edit your ArmyOps.ini at the follwing sections and with the following values:
Those lines are already there, just change the values!
You DO NOT get CVAR pb kicks for those changes (as long as you stay Inside the values I posted below! don't go too high nor too low.)
[Engine.Player]
ConfiguredInternetSpeed=10001 <- NetSpeed should be high for you to get Past 90 FPS, I had mine as 80000, try it your self to see a lower and better value if needed.
ConfiguredLanSpeed=10001 <- Same as above, changing this ensure it works fine with 25Assist.

[IpDrv.TcpNetDriver]
MaxClientRate=10001 <- Same as NetSpeed, BUT may not have effect Client Side(test your self), I do use it for server config because I don't care .

[Engine.LevelInfo]
MaxClientFrameRate=999.000000 <-This is the Max FPS You can get in-game (online). Do 144.000000? Remember locking FPS doesn't remove Tearing, only vsync/other syncs do.

[D3DDrv.D3DRenderDevice]
DesiredRefreshRate=144 <- This is the Desired Refresh rate, I don't know how it behaves in Borderless windowed, a.k.a. "Advanced SF" in 25Assist Client Settings>Video.
OverrideDesktopRefreshRate=True <- This is to ensure you can get Refresh rate above your desktop rate.

So you have did it all and your FPS is still locked? Type: NetSpeed 10001 (or the value you prefer, max of 80000, min  2700, see explanaition above of why NetSpeed needs to be high) to release your FPS. This Happens because the server set your initial NetSpeed if you have a value higher than the Max in the server config.

Yes you still gain/loose honor, max of 110 if you have 100 of honor you get a veteran icon in-game.
We do Honor claims as well.

Assist login is you BT username and PW not AAO Player Name

Oh man the top ones of swiss investigating a DDoS attack on a game with maximum 100 players at a time. That would actually make me laugh quite a lot

Not for the Game neither for the Auth.

Can you point where I have *drive* your server?
You have nothing to blame me for the posible attacks other than your thougts. Listen, you are not going to get nothing from this patetic thread, i noticed by the sb comments that we have been attacked again, i didnt seen you offering help with your high tier specialists, without the auth your servers are just a bunch of white elephants. Take care of your stuff, let us take care of ours, if you dont like, the door is open for you, makes no difference to me to have you or not around. Its our forums, it open to the public but its not public property, we know how we can manage and if we feel someone must be moderated, we will do what ever we can do to control our forum as we wish, just as you do with your stuff.

Anyway, it obvious I speak for myself only.

If you email was public and you didnt used that email for enough time, your email gets deleted so anyone can create an email as yours. This happens with hotmail emails.

You know this is my guid because it is explicit written in the PB Config files as:
pb_sv_namelock 7695df6c0524a57e511e2f720f56db46 Possessed
I have no reason keep playing on any of your servers, as it would be unplayable for me.
I don't see any logs of my account getting kicked in any of your servers, so how would I know that my guid was banned there lol.
As someone that manage lots of servers, I'm sure you have seen the PB power line(both at console and config file) many times and is only complaining now to create something that could relate with the posible "attacks". You haven't any matching IP that could support 1% of your statement, Poor attempt. Different from the Attacks we suffered, that came from a know user IP.

Also weren't the attacks from Venezuela? or this isnt important, as you want to blame me for it lol.

So you know ddos attacks by names and types, that isnt what you have been saying about the attacks Auth have been suffering. Now you know how much a ddos attack costs, interesting that you didn't came with all this knowledgment when we were under attack, so we can also blame you for the attacks, right?
Have you ever heard of port scanning or you gonna hide this term as well just to support your bad point?