Forum

I could quote you, and totally punch holes in that statement, but it would take too much time and effort, push me and I will though! like a curled up dog you back away. And you failed to feel the ironic undertone in the "iam pro" part, which kinda sets the bar for this conversation with you. I could tell you that you remind me of my ex, by the way you argue and zigzag your way out of this mess you painted up around you, but that'd just be an insult to her.

Or we just laugh at it, unless you think internet is serious buisness, especially a forum, with a tightly knitted group - Which you just registered on, then telling us what hurts this community. You rule, you got my vote. I will respond with whatever I see fit, and within the forum rules. Your undertone is not to be underestimated. This is not you and the community against me. You got it all backwards mate.

Dude will you give it a rest. I know ganja, played with him for years. He loves me and i love him (in a highly homosexual way) I wouldn't write it unless i knew he would take it the right way. Lay the fuck off.

Really glad you wrote that, so i get to quote Robert A. Dahl (google him)
Effective participation
Citizens must have adequate and equal opportunities to form their preference and place questions on the public agenda and express reasons for one outcome over the other.

Voting equality at the decisive stage
Each citizen must be assured his or her judgments will be counted as equal in weights to the judgments of others.

Enlightened understanding
Citizens must enjoy ample and equal opportunities for discovering and affirming what choice would best serve their interests.

Control of the agenda
Demos or people must have the opportunity to decide what political matters actually are and what should be brought up for deliberation
.
Inclusiveness
Equality must extend to all citizens within the state. Everyone has legitimate stake within the political process.

Care to get into a deeper political discussion over this matter?

And with this you're shooting your own foot, going on about DEMOCRACY (even with the capital letters) and the next second pointing on that my opinion don't count. I love you.

Yeah, but seriously dude, Are you slow for real? If the competitive players would leave, it would have a huge effect on the number or players (you know removing 10 apples will make you have less apples to eat) And the game would not have as many people playing it, sure you would have like minded players (without what you call tweaking, which today is all but dead i might inform you ignorant person) There isn't a single tweak, that I don't know about, that can be used to gain an advantage in todays AA ini file. Before there was, but it's gone. We're all in this with the same settings. You are just worse than me at this particular game, im so sorry dude but you really ask for it typing shit like that out. It might sound really good in your head, but just looks like a joke to me. What you think about competitive players was right 5 years ago, when AA was at it's peak, now we're just a couple of guys which all know eachother more or less trying to make the best out of a shitty situation, especially when we're faced with these kinds of polls from someone who is "just tired of the game and how it plays out" instead of changing his own way of playing, yes spanky. You.

What about make everybody happy? Make randompawnmaps if you want but keep the original maps. Period.
If you feel like creating more fun with random spawns, go for it, but don't remove the normal maps.

Fact is, randomzing spawnpoints will totally kill the competitive side of AA, you might not care.