Either you are blind, or you just playing politics now. Server admins abuse is an obvious problem for years, and you don't have to read forum or shoutbox to recognize that. Just play the fucking game for a bit (without having the AAO25.com tag on you, ofc.).
Like I said on my next post, it does happen, but 95% of the shoutbox entries about such issues are false.
As for zoxee, nice job compiling all this, must have taken some effort!
I don't think people who would lose their servers would suddenly start donating that money to Assist. In an ideal world, this might happen, but in this one they'll probably just come here and bitch about it and be even more reluctant to donate anything (plus, a lot of the servers are home-run anyway).
If we did get the donations or had the resources, then as I've explained before, 10 servers is definitely too little, as in order to not lose players we would have to cover all the continents. 20 might work, but I'm a little skeptical to be honest.
And do you realize this would mean a lot more work for Assist admins? We'd be responsible for setting up and controlling all the servers (with a possible addition of a few community admins) and I really don't think we have the resources for that (manpower). We can't just go ahead and add new admins on a limb.
All in all your ideas are great, take control and force people to play different maps would work wonders theoretically, but the only way I would see this happening is gradually.