226
Games & Programming / Re: opengl problem
« on: Saturday, November 02, 2013, 13:54:24 PM »... when I get to the framebuffer blending stage, some weird artefacts start to pop up ...Post screenshot.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
227
General Chat / Re: 1 computer and 2 users
« on: Saturday, November 02, 2013, 13:35:13 PM »Lol I do, 5 laptops and 2 PC,sYou scrap computer parts for Gold Recovery ..?
On Topic:
As above...
228
Ban Appeals / Re: AutoHotKey Banned Account
« on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 01:45:28 AM »Detection:Injected lua script...
What was that LScript.dll file for?
229
General Chat / Re: Poll majority
« on: Monday, October 28, 2013, 20:28:09 PM »People do not enjoy being forced. It is not a matter of liking, it is a matter of enjoying.
Likeness towards something concerns but is not exclusive to emotional satisfaction vs. logical consensus.
Whereas joy has solely to do with the emotional-side, that is, the emotional perspective/perception of things.
For most people the word 'like' is associated with 'fun' / 'enjoy' ...
Off Topic:
Chill out a little, because your post sounds like a quote from an encyclopedia. Besides, imagine that not only you have (..?) a good education - it was not necessary.
230
General Chat / Re: Poll majority
« on: Monday, October 28, 2013, 19:07:42 PM »
People don't like to be forced... Basic information about the polls should suffice.
BTW: 'majority' = 2/3 votes
...if not, the subject of poll should be re-discussed.
BTW: 'majority' = 2/3 votes
...if not, the subject of poll should be re-discussed.
231
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: [Poll] Banning Policy...
« on: Wednesday, October 23, 2013, 19:41:30 PM »Or maybe you should learn how to properly present a poll, properly ask a question, and have all information easily available in your 1st post so that people can make a proper selection? That is if you expect the poll to accurately represent the desired outcome you better ask the question properly - instead of assuming everyone's going to troll through 6 pages, before going back to make their vote lmao. I see you put a lot of thought into this.You're good at sarcasm, but not good enough...
That would make too much sense tho.
How do you expect this poll to accurately represent anything when you have so much grey area - oh wait, you edited ur 1st post to say read all 6 pages LOL
There is no point to bring in to the poll all related to the 'Second Chance' options, simply because we didn't even know if second chance will be given. If true, we can discuss the details of condition, but for now, it's just pointless...
232
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: [Poll] Banning Policy...
« on: Wednesday, October 23, 2013, 12:15:56 PM »... Because the only options are yes, tag or ban....there are no details.For the details is this thread - that why you should read it... But don't worry, your opposition can't win because majority of active people here are conservatives.
233
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: [Poll] Banning Policy...
« on: Wednesday, October 23, 2013, 11:00:23 AM »No need to read anything with such a easy question.Intelligent people will always read, what will be signed.
Why..? i.e.
I would only agree to the hacker tag with other conditions. Their accounts get deleted and had to start fresh - honor / aa account, as well as tracker. AND got this tag, as well as remaining on the hall of shame....there is +/- 20 posts talking about 'Hacker Tag', but he still don't know that conditions are not definitive (the same for 'Second chance'...) and he is close to what we have talking about.
This poll is just to know if the second chance should be given or not.
...and those two, one post above - just no words...
234
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Banning Policy...
« on: Tuesday, October 22, 2013, 22:52:51 PM »
I see we need a poll - read all posts before voting.
235
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Banning Policy...
« on: Tuesday, October 22, 2013, 15:57:24 PM »... I have NEVER been banned by any organization or server owner...It was not about: you were caught or not - forget...
On Topic:
I think that there is enough informations in this thread to go ahead and take by Devs some decisions - by poll, by discusion between Devs - it's your call...
236
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Banning Policy...
« on: Tuesday, October 22, 2013, 15:06:45 PM »He thinks you are Spanky or Possessed.... and you are Santa Claus ...
What do you mean?Be serious...
237
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Banning Policy...
« on: Tuesday, October 22, 2013, 13:31:09 PM »Don t led it come so farIt's almost the same as I suggested before.
Give them time to think!!! 3 time s is out!!!!!
1- 3 month
2- half year
3- out!! thx bye!!
Here is a novel idea...Strange statement for a guy who was making/use the hacks... BTW: you're here because of second chance. I thought, you will be the first one who believes in redemption.
1 ban... never play again.
Why are we discussing this?
...Imagine I go on holiday 2 months. I hack just before the holidays to see if my hacks are detected. Im banned. I come back from holiday, I say sorry, I can play again. Life's beautiful...Not exactly, if i.e. after three month of punishment and next 3-6 under observation (with hacker tag etc.) he will say 'I'm sorry' here on forum, it will be good thing and first step to forgiveness. Of course, he will remain on the list of suspects anyway.
238
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Banning Policy...
« on: Tuesday, October 22, 2013, 11:49:31 AM »Are you making a joke or something?Nope... Look, read between the lines...
For each: 'Why..?';'For what..?';'Can be removed..?' someone needs to answer - devs are busy already... Besides, questions like this are annoying and will spam the forum. For the same reason, I suggested ban from the forum and send only personal message with conditions.
Second, I see no objections If guy will show the regret of what he did. Tag period should be long enough, to satisfy both sides.
239
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Banning Policy...
« on: Tuesday, October 22, 2013, 11:02:30 AM »... It's to warn people that he has been caught once, so keep an eye on him ...Basically, you're right, but there is possibility that people will complain too much - which should not to happen if tag will be just temporary.
240
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Banning Policy...
« on: Tuesday, October 22, 2013, 10:50:32 AM »Give one valid reason why it should be removed?...we are not Nazis..?
Donations
Help keep Assist going. Donate to cover our server costs.
July Goal:
$80.00
Due Date: Jul 31
Total Receipts: $0.00
Below Goal: $80.00
Site Currency: USD
Due Date: Jul 31
Total Receipts: $0.00
Below Goal: $80.00
Site Currency: USD
0%
Play for free!
Download Now
Recent Topics [Unread]
Shoutbox0 in game, 8 online
poool open :D
i think gunny and bart should be lawyers..i would hire either one of them to defend me on anything.. or maybe they were part of the debate club in high school ..lol.. i read everything, and i have to say as an english teacher..well said on both parts.. i enjoyed reading them..
Groovy gang open!!!!!!
Audible message stating "This is a serious matter, blah blah blah"
Nope got banned for 1 day again, says UNAUT LOGIN
Good call rain, logged out and back in and im in the server. thanks man
tomato! LOL
Apart from that, I think the answer is clear, so we can keep talking in circles, but that's a waste of energy for everybody.
So we know now that you think there are people with assist admin friends who turn blind eyes, we know that you think that your friends would be banned in an instant (FYI, there were friends of you who misbehaved multiple times in the past, but didn't get banned like that), and I see now that even when you clearly had a response, you keep trying on other places again, acting as if you didn't know.
I want to politely ask you to stop that. If someone is creating a toxic environment, we will take action. If there is no current misbehaviour, we do not have the manpower/energy/priority to actively hunt, but we do block the creation of 2nd accounts. That's the final thing, and that won't change.
So please, focus the energy on enjoying the game. And if you see active misbehaviour on servers, report it with screenshots and we will do as it fits.
But if there is no misbehaviour anymore, let it go.
So we know now that you think there are people with assist admin friends who turn blind eyes, we know that you think that your friends would be banned in an instant (FYI, there were friends of you who misbehaved multiple times in the past, but didn't get banned like that), and I see now that even when you clearly had a response, you keep trying on other places again, acting as if you didn't know.
I want to politely ask you to stop that. If someone is creating a toxic environment, we will take action. If there is no current misbehaviour, we do not have the manpower/energy/priority to actively hunt, but we do block the creation of 2nd accounts. That's the final thing, and that won't change.
So please, focus the energy on enjoying the game. And if you see active misbehaviour on servers, report it with screenshots and we will do as it fits.
But if there is no misbehaviour anymore, let it go.
It was probably a bug Tomato. Try logging out of the Assist client and then logging back
lol
Will be there soon, matey! :)
gun you gonna play today, im on ur server
-nx.cuntlight!
mr_tattletale-GB
Who runs the 82nd server??
It's a bit tiring when you keep asking the same thing everywhere while you clearly had a response already.
I wouldn't disclose private messages. In this case I expected that sharing that someone said "Ok, fair enough", wouldn't be any issue nor disclose any information. It was mostly to repeat my previous statement and acknowledge that you already seen it and answered. If you think that's a misinterpretation, then my apologies.
I wouldn't disclose private messages. In this case I expected that sharing that someone said "Ok, fair enough", wouldn't be any issue nor disclose any information. It was mostly to repeat my previous statement and acknowledge that you already seen it and answered. If you think that's a misinterpretation, then my apologies.
Why am I perm banned on 82nd server?
You self-describing there, gunny? Let's try and calm it down. We have never (not even the post you referred to) said that we'll be retroactively looking into second accounts. All that post - clearly, I might add - said was that we wouldn't activate clear alt accounts.
URBAN OPEN :)
That ‘Ok fair enough’ was sarcasm, by the way, but thanks VERY much for making public what I thought was a PRIVATE message....
Ok, well, if nobody in authority literally can’t be bothered to keep tabs on fuckwits who have regularly broken the rules time and time again, and continue to do so, then I can’t be bothered to report any bad behaviour in the game. Why the fuck should I bother whenever I try to report anything and I rarely ever get any reply...... Even if I do get a reply, it’s somehow me at fault.
I don't mind multi-accounts if anyone asks me :)
I copy and paste our exact conversation. I thought we cleared this. I'm not going to repeat every week...
Bart — 6/27/2025 4:50 PM
Hi, on his regular ip he can't create new accounts. But when there are no new violations, i don't have the energy to actively hunt anything. The goal for me is to avoid breaking the ToS, not to have a witchhunt.
Mr_Gunman-GB — 6/27/2025 9:57 PM
Ok, fair enough..... 👍
Bart — 6/27/2025 4:50 PM
Hi, on his regular ip he can't create new accounts. But when there are no new violations, i don't have the energy to actively hunt anything. The goal for me is to avoid breaking the ToS, not to have a witchhunt.
Mr_Gunman-GB — 6/27/2025 9:57 PM
Ok, fair enough..... 👍
Teddy, I was referring to the post you made some time ago regarding the multiple accounts policy, here: https://aao25.com/forum/news-82/updated-multiple-account-policy/. />
When Joe was released a few months ago, it was on condition that he can only play with one account (the JoE131 account), so why does he now have access to at least 4 (including his original)? I know at least two of those have been ‘given’ to him by one of his friends in order to circumvent the single account condition that was given to him when he was unbanned. One of those accounts was renamed to a similar username as one of his other friends, to make it look like him and not one of Joe’s alternative accounts. This can only be to further create a greater degree of anonymity. It clearly goes against the single account condition that was given, and it completely contradicts the policy outlined in the attached forum tread, so why is that allowed?
When Joe was released a few months ago, it was on condition that he can only play with one account (the JoE131 account), so why does he now have access to at least 4 (including his original)? I know at least two of those have been ‘given’ to him by one of his friends in order to circumvent the single account condition that was given to him when he was unbanned. One of those accounts was renamed to a similar username as one of his other friends, to make it look like him and not one of Joe’s alternative accounts. This can only be to further create a greater degree of anonymity. It clearly goes against the single account condition that was given, and it completely contradicts the policy outlined in the attached forum tread, so why is that allowed?
He also have lot accounts :D
Yeah gunman is always friedn with bumpy :D
yeah there's that racist guy that always has different names
I could play but Bridge only server is not my thing
old farts playing tonight?
gunman is right! i have notice alot of undercover accounts recently but i never knew it was someone higher up
Gunman, please don't put words in my mouth.
We have never policed the existence of extra accounts. You're pals with multiple people who regularly use multiple.
Our policy is to not allow the creation of new accounts for the same person. Unless it's to do with ban evasion, we don't monitor the use of multiple accounts by a single person. The same rules go for everyone.
We have never policed the existence of extra accounts. You're pals with multiple people who regularly use multiple.
Our policy is to not allow the creation of new accounts for the same person. Unless it's to do with ban evasion, we don't monitor the use of multiple accounts by a single person. The same rules go for everyone.
Using at least 4 or 5 accounts to play undercover. Using a VPN to (try) and hide your identity. You’re only supposed to be using one account and, according to the rules laid out by Teddy, nobody is supposed to be playing undercover to get around bans. You’re lucky you have Assist admin friends who turn a blind eye to this, if any one of us do what you do, we’d be permanently banned in an instant.
using hacks :D
better than the groovy server - banned for no reason- @gunman why am i banned? carmy told me to ask you
urban open :) all players welcome :D
aa tracker net open pool all pppl welcome
Brahva it was simply, "not many players as usual these days" for real
lol now i am curious chron..what was the comment lol hmmm? lol
11 players Extraction!!!
Gunman ready for killing :D
Roger Grizzly, My comment was meaningless anyway. Was curious. Thankks
Chron, which comment are you referring to? All the comments you've made in the shoutbox in the last 24h (3) are still up.
If there's other messages that you sent to the shoutbox, they never made it to our systems.
If there's other messages that you sent to the shoutbox, they never made it to our systems.
lets make hell !
urban open :D
ok 82nd ABD MAPVOTE! added to tracking :D im not assist admin :D
no freddom of speech here,,if u say something assist admins dont like it is removed...no freedom of speech here depends who u r and who u know ..lol..many comment of mine have been erased..and i suspect this ine too lol]
why was my comment taken down? just curious?
3 players urban !
