You just touched the topic I conversated about with Ronski on pm. Have you ever presented _any_ _HARD_ proofs about any of the bans you made?
No.
You banned vossy just because there was too much stir about him on forums and shoutbox. I was ridiculing this vossy guy, you removed my shouts, and then immediately you banned him.
I'm not saying your decision was wrong, it was _correct_, but _please_ stop keep on saying this bs that "you ban only with proofs". You don't present any proofs, so it's like you don't have them. In this particular respect, you are no better the "dictator" p****3 admin.
No better. You are _no_ _better_ than what I did here:
http://aao25.com/forum/ban-appeals-98/bans-without-'hard-proofs'
Again, to make it clear: I think your actions are _correct_. Just don't try to BS me that it's any better than what I did.
Touche. However, Eliz didn't ban Vossy on people's observation alone. He was getting errors referencing things that don't even exist in 2.5 or something like that. In other words, he was doing fishy things to the game nobody else would do. Eliz could probably explain it better that I could. While there wasn't any "hard proof" there was enough reason to believe he was cheating given how fishy his play was. Vossy, however, is an exception to the people that are banned from this game which are mostly for detected known hacks like shadowbot. Do you not consider a cvar violation enough proof?
So to bring this whole thing back on topic, with Vossy we had hints that he was doing something fishy aside from his gameplay. Here I have no way to know who's being truthful or not. None at all. The language barrier makes it even harder to sort out. We don't really want to waste our time trying to solve disputes. Yes, I wish all of our players could just get along and play in harmony, but that's not going to happen and it's hard to try to force people together.