Forum

I'm going to postpone this map for quite a while. I'm just not feeling the desire to work anymore. I've entirely lost interest in AA and maps. I feel like 2.5 is going back to old habits and that's all I'll say about that.

This site will stay up so no worries on that. I'll help out when my help is needed but I'm just not motivated to contribute anymore. If someone else wants to work on this map some more, go for it. Consider this my 7th resignation.

I'll definitely look at it and see if I want to do anything. My interest in AA may be dwindling but I love making maps. It's fun to me.

who said that was a bad thing? as archi said before, if the governments of todays world weren't corrupt and packed full of shit eaters, then why would wikileaks be seen as such a threat? also, you said before that anon doesn't do shit, yet you say here they take down government and corporate websites. not really sure how your argument lines up :-x

because taking down a site for an hour or two doesn't do shit. It's useless, just like the group itself. They're just adding to the problem. Did you not read any of my posts? I thought I made my point pretty obvious.

examples of bad ones? besides yelling DUMBLEDORE DIES at the harry potter book release

Taking down government and corporate websites. This is what they mainly do, and it is not productive at all.

I don't follow them at all, I haven't been on 4chan in years or reddit in months. When I'm really bored I'll hop on 420chan and lurk for a while but I don't have any idea what they've been up to as of late. I remember reading about that anon some cartel was holding and they threatened to release names of members of the cartel if they didn't let him go. Eventually he was released by the cartel, who threatened them into not releasing any names. Not sure how much of that story is true but I heard lots of people talking about it a few months ago.

Julian Assange > Anon, though

Wikileaks is amazing. If governments weren't so corrupt and packed full of bullshit wikileaks wouldn't be seen as a threat.

wikileaks is nothing like anonymous. Not comparable in the slightest.  And Anonymous always backs out of their threats when they realize they can't do shit. The cartels is a great example. They said they were going after the cartels, a "member" is supposedly captured and guess what they never did? If you guess attack the cartels you would be correct. They're nothing but jokes that want to feel important but really aren't.

Wikileaks actually released embarrassing shit, Anonymous takes down a website for a little bit and tries to act like they are important.

I never lie.

ah, Now I know you're not serious.

lol any1 that uses a flash is a noob, lots of skill killn a blind man

get rid of noob ass flashes and noob ass silencers

Umadbro?

ummm..idk about facebook, but , they hack the FBI site regularly, think the holiday is called Fuck FBI Friday.... pretty sure most the sites they hack into that make headline news have pretty good security measures as well... And i agree, nothing has been changed directly cuz of them, but disagree that they are 'useless'  with the publicity and arrests being made around the world, its obvious they are seen as some kind of threat... and to my knowledge, they are still around.

Again, stop saying "hack". They don't hack anything. They use pre-made scripts to take down sites or gain unsecure databases. They don't do any hacking. They never hacked the FBI, they just took the site down. They never will hack the FBI. Also, them being arrested has nothing to do with how useful they are. I guess people who smoke pot are super important because they get arrested for possession, right? /sarcasm.

What good has Anonymous done? Cool, they can take down the Bank of America website for a few hours, what does that achieve? Nothing. Life goes on as if it never happened. These wannabe "internet heroes" are nothing but a bunch of jokes who have nothing better to do in their lives.

They make headline news because the media loves to blow stuff out of proportion. Why do celebrities going shopping make the news? Is that important as well?

Anonymous doesn't necessarily "hack" anything. They are a bunch of kids with scripts that attack vulnerable websites. The entire group is a joke. They act like they are doing good, but in reality, they''re not. Nothing they have done has changed anything.

They pledged to take down facebook, and guess what didn't happen? Because they couldn't. Any site with half decent security is protected from those kids.