Forum

Nothing but a bunch of power happy losers getting all butt hurt and crying over nothing but bs. You are all ( or at least vast majority of you ) nothing but a bunch of tools. Enjoy your sh1t delusional and dwindling community if you can even call it that.

Personally, I think that it's too late for you, but you have two weeks to learn some good manners so, don't waste your time.

... and show some respect.

You are not allowed to shoot when going from crouching/standing to prone position, that is while your busy doing the particular action.

I do not know whether you were in Army or you have any idea about the guns and how to use it, but in real life, even in such a situation, you can use the weapons.

AA is the Official US Army game, but it ISN'T a simulator, if you wan't "real combat" Get  Arma/OFP series... or try to play with different tactics instead of bashing someone else work.

FYI, simulation and simulator it's not the same ...

As for ArmA: that's exactly what I'm doing. 

Oops, lapsus linguae... Of course, that I had in mind 600 series.

As for my PC, I'm changing it every year or two - I like to be on top... Well, maybe also because of the needs of my work.

How exactly is testing  a hack in a server learning how it works? It may show you what it does, but will not show you how it does it. Plus, the hack description tells you what it does, so that excuse is complete BS.

I'll tell you (without entering to the details)... e.g. in RE (Reverse engineering) the visuals - end result - is very important. It is much easier if you know how given application works / looks / behaves in real time.

Q: Why on Server?
A: Because on LAN you can't test applications like hacks without the  enemies.

Why u think its my first post?

...because now you have two (look at the upper left corner of your post - beneath your avatar now is: Posts: 2) - smart ass...

Anyways, who the f*** you think you are!?

Another lost cause... Why..? Hmmm - long story short:
At the beginning I was like any others - I wanted to help. Because I have good knowledge of UE 1/2/3 (form inside out - include natives...), I made my offer to help in game development, but they didn't want to. Simply because I couldn't give them some proof of my work - I just can't... Probably, after this post you will see some explanation why they reacted like this, but you know, sometimes you must take the risk. Especially when you have nothing to lose - game is dying...

Usually I don't ask twice, but I saw possibility and potential in so much hated by them AA3. I've spend some time reading all related to AA3 posts (not only on this forum) to know what exactly they don't like in this game - it was just a gameplay (mostly game mechanics). After this, I said: modern engine, better 'look', gameplay will be not that hard to rewrite - why not? But... Yet again, they didn't want to. This time I can understand why - time and resource consuming long term project, but when you looking at the bigger picture, it was worth to try.

Next was 'Banning Policy', but (I suppose...) you already know this story. Only this time, I knew the result of voting from the beginning, because I follow this community long before my subscription and (more or less) I know the local ideologies. ... maybe I wanted too - among the others - prove myself something.

Now you have collected some of my ideas, added yours and you trying to change something... Something - I agree with all of your propositions except the payment - which needs to be changed for the good of the entire community. And once again the same reaction... Even my last point '7.'is not acceptable for admins, probably because they can be among the first who will got the warning points.

Conclusion: they don't want to change anything... For them, is OK like it is and there is nothing you can do.

So now, I will be watching from distance how this game/community is dying - another sad story...

NBD.

In regards to my English...I'm Portuguese. I was self-taught English through a lot of philosophical reading and writing. Through error and trial. Although I am not as hard to understand when I speak simply due to the fact that most of what is spoken is not the slightest as complex and pragmatically methodic as what is addressed through words nowadays. The fact that I ended up writing my own dissertation and fine-tune my search for fairness in both speech and presentation also made it hard to believe that simple = sufficient --partially because sufficiency itself is none at all a simple matter.
...

To me, you are a regular snob... 

...
P.S:. Sorry for my complex English. If need be, Google Translate is available.

Intelligent people can adapt to every conversation (without forcing anyone to align to their level...).

... or just maybe, yet another kid with too big ambitions to their capabilities ...