196
Background Checks / Re: =BLOKERS=Ludwik[PL]
« on: Saturday, November 16, 2013, 09:33:05 AM »
The only thing I could imagine is that he maybe uses some nifty macros/tweaks, but yeah, we'll see.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
197
Background Checks / Re: =BLOKERS=Ludwik[PL]
« on: Saturday, November 16, 2013, 09:18:54 AM »
As someone who plays a lot of bridge, Ludwik and the other BLOKERS guys are good bridge players, both on Assault and defense btw 
If you want to submit everybody who gets high scores on one map like Bridge Crossing you'll spend quite some time doing that...
If you want to submit everybody who gets high scores on one map like Bridge Crossing you'll spend quite some time doing that...
198
Background Checks / Re: Vegeta
« on: Saturday, November 16, 2013, 09:17:07 AM »
We of SASF are collecting screenshots of him tk'ing our clan, but wouldn't make a post until I've got a decent collection of screenshots. He also once changed his name to SASF^RedDead to confuse people and try to talk shit about us, as we have a member called SASF-RedDead.
199
Background Checks / Re: -Fire.[Turtle]
« on: Friday, November 15, 2013, 12:16:09 PM »you stupid *** ***** go get a lifeTelling people to go get a life, and directly after that you start flaming other people?
OHW PS. YES THIS IS ME
lets do some 1v1 ill demorec whatever you like, i'll play with every anticheat game opened and i still rape you
Something with a pot and a kettle.
200
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Suggestions
« on: Thursday, November 14, 2013, 16:47:41 PM »It's not donation anymore - it's a payment...You're wrong about the free hacks, there are several hacks, like Shadowbot which had a private version. I know for a fact that -{DG}-Crusade earned money of those, also the creater of ultimatemod btw.
... of course not, but most probably End of the Assist. For now, AA does not pay attention to what's happening with their game (to Assist, to what is doing this community...), but situation will change when - in one way or another - their game will be used to make money.
Once again: all hacks are for free. You can download from everywhere, you can compile yourself even they can teach you how to do it - all of this is for free.
201
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Suggestions
« on: Thursday, November 14, 2013, 14:37:52 PM »another aspect i read here is the money earning itself. i think all money, which comes in, should be reinvested into the community. noone should earn any money...
the major aim should be to boost the community.
I agree with you, but if one took out like 5 bucks out of the common 'moneyjar' you wouldn't hear me complaining, as they put a lot of time, work and effort into this fantastic project.
202
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Suggestions
« on: Thursday, November 14, 2013, 14:34:57 PM »
Not sure if i'm understanding you correctly, but if it is what I think, like BF heroes style, where u can pay to customize yr guy, i don't feel like its a good idea
I don't see it as paying to costumise your character, I think Eliz means it as a little extra you get once you donate, you don't pay the money for the costumisation.
203
Server Support / Re: Server mods
« on: Thursday, November 14, 2013, 10:25:52 AM »Its ok to play without being tracked, the problem is when you are still tracked in time, but any kill won't count... So your kills per hour rate will decrease as you playing on moded servers. It is misleading tracker. You choose to track it OR not at all right?Certain mods will improve the total amount of campers though. For example a map like Bridge Crossing with SF gives camping a whole new meaning...
Sherminator speaking in the name of "oldschool" gamers lol thats a good one. I had a lot of fun on both regular and moded servers along my 8 years playing, and it asks more skills to master each weapon of this game, rather than using your m4a1 whole year long.
Also keep in mind that this is a game and some people will camp with or WITHOUT mods
204
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Suggestions
« on: Thursday, November 14, 2013, 07:26:20 AM »
I can somewhat relate to the complaints about the usage of big words even though I have no difficulty understanding any of it. Most european people on here have either a high school level of English, or even lower than that due to a lack of English in their schooling. Then there are people like e.g. Bart who have to use a more professional type of English due to their higher education. I can't imagine it being too much to ask for to try to watch out a bit with the words you use, because undoubtably you can acknowledge that certain words aren't commonly used in ordinary everyday conversations. For example, I try to make no grammar mistakes while typing little paragraphs like this, but I won't go over it a few times to make sure there are no little errors in it (hell, I'm sure I've made quite a lot already), like I would do for my essays and such. I also agree with NoBigDeal, intelligent people can change their way of speaking to a manner that anybody can understand, when necessary of course.
205
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Suggestions
« on: Wednesday, November 13, 2013, 15:36:15 PM »Ok, lets forget about the TAG option and lets go for other option such as only staff knows who is banned players and who of them are playing. Nobody would know, no harm.Nobody would know? I too can do a decent background check, and there are many more who are able to do so.
Ok, now I want you all to go to ''Half of shame'' and count all those banned accounts. Using no flash no recoil, multi hack, private hack and so on that has policy of permanent ban. Tell me, how this would not increase player base.
And I'm pretty sure it wouldn't give that much of a boost to the playerbase, because a lot of players wouldn't be too happy to have a bigger possibility of hackers ingame thus the 'normal' clean players would be leaving or at least be playing less than they did before.
206
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Suggestions
« on: Wednesday, November 13, 2013, 15:27:23 PM »DARKSHOOTER@ Assist would not force you, YOU and people who is BUYING must agree with the rules, they are not forcing, you accept or decline as it is in ''Term of Conditions'' before playing the game. You must also agree with their rules before you throw your own rules.If it would get to that point I'd happily cancle my own server by that time, because that would be a waste of money on my side.
207
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Suggestions
« on: Wednesday, November 13, 2013, 15:09:27 PM »Hosting companies must get permission from Assist, am I right? If they do, Assit could easily order them these kind of rules. Why not? Assist could simply run their own servers. They can easily take down those companies that offer servers for you to play. Oh trust me, assist can do anything they want because it's their software.Assist can do whatever they want, but they have to be careful with what they do. You can't just do whatever you'd like, you have to bear the opinion of your target audience in mind. If I think I have a solid reason to ban someone (in my opinion) from MY server that I pay for and somebody from the development team is forcing me to allow that person to play because they received a little bag of money is ridiculous.
208
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Suggestions
« on: Wednesday, November 13, 2013, 15:02:19 PM »I now it sounds very good. Make cheaters pay money to ''ASSIST'' rather than paying to cheat apps.That would be completely right if you'd actually rent a server from Assist, which I don't. I rent a server from an independent hosting company which has it's own agreement about servers with the Assist people.
But you know, admins can sort this kind of stuff. Even though players buy servers, they have to agree with itself ''Assist'' rules. They abuse something, they abuse the system that is built. As I said it would not hurt anyone, but a try is always a hope to something successful.
209
Ban Appeals / Re: I get banned because: ROE Violantion HELP!!
« on: Wednesday, November 13, 2013, 15:00:09 PM »
This probably had to do with a lot of (intentional) team-killing from your side whilst playing.
210
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: Suggestions
« on: Wednesday, November 13, 2013, 14:55:43 PM »So they would pay just to be kicked by every server admin? That would be a disaster.
That is exactly the problem I have with this idea. Of course it would be a nice extra to get a little extra funding by letting cheaters 'pay for a second chance' but you can't guarantee they will get the aforementioned second chance on the servers they will play on. That would make their little 'investment' rather useless and to me that seems a bit sketchy on the ethical side.
Donations
Help keep Assist going. Donate to cover our server costs.
July Goal:
$80.00
Due Date: Jul 31
Total Receipts: $0.00
Below Goal: $80.00
Site Currency: USD
Due Date: Jul 31
Total Receipts: $0.00
Below Goal: $80.00
Site Currency: USD
0%
Play for free!
Download Now
Recent Topics [Unread]
Shoutbox12 in game, 21 online
poool open :D
i think gunny and bart should be lawyers..i would hire either one of them to defend me on anything.. or maybe they were part of the debate club in high school ..lol.. i read everything, and i have to say as an english teacher..well said on both parts.. i enjoyed reading them..
Groovy gang open!!!!!!
Audible message stating "This is a serious matter, blah blah blah"
Nope got banned for 1 day again, says UNAUT LOGIN
Good call rain, logged out and back in and im in the server. thanks man
tomato! LOL
Apart from that, I think the answer is clear, so we can keep talking in circles, but that's a waste of energy for everybody.
So we know now that you think there are people with assist admin friends who turn blind eyes, we know that you think that your friends would be banned in an instant (FYI, there were friends of you who misbehaved multiple times in the past, but didn't get banned like that), and I see now that even when you clearly had a response, you keep trying on other places again, acting as if you didn't know.
I want to politely ask you to stop that. If someone is creating a toxic environment, we will take action. If there is no current misbehaviour, we do not have the manpower/energy/priority to actively hunt, but we do block the creation of 2nd accounts. That's the final thing, and that won't change.
So please, focus the energy on enjoying the game. And if you see active misbehaviour on servers, report it with screenshots and we will do as it fits.
But if there is no misbehaviour anymore, let it go.
So we know now that you think there are people with assist admin friends who turn blind eyes, we know that you think that your friends would be banned in an instant (FYI, there were friends of you who misbehaved multiple times in the past, but didn't get banned like that), and I see now that even when you clearly had a response, you keep trying on other places again, acting as if you didn't know.
I want to politely ask you to stop that. If someone is creating a toxic environment, we will take action. If there is no current misbehaviour, we do not have the manpower/energy/priority to actively hunt, but we do block the creation of 2nd accounts. That's the final thing, and that won't change.
So please, focus the energy on enjoying the game. And if you see active misbehaviour on servers, report it with screenshots and we will do as it fits.
But if there is no misbehaviour anymore, let it go.
It was probably a bug Tomato. Try logging out of the Assist client and then logging back
lol
Will be there soon, matey! :)
gun you gonna play today, im on ur server
-nx.cuntlight!
mr_tattletale-GB
Who runs the 82nd server??
It's a bit tiring when you keep asking the same thing everywhere while you clearly had a response already.
I wouldn't disclose private messages. In this case I expected that sharing that someone said "Ok, fair enough", wouldn't be any issue nor disclose any information. It was mostly to repeat my previous statement and acknowledge that you already seen it and answered. If you think that's a misinterpretation, then my apologies.
I wouldn't disclose private messages. In this case I expected that sharing that someone said "Ok, fair enough", wouldn't be any issue nor disclose any information. It was mostly to repeat my previous statement and acknowledge that you already seen it and answered. If you think that's a misinterpretation, then my apologies.
Why am I perm banned on 82nd server?
You self-describing there, gunny? Let's try and calm it down. We have never (not even the post you referred to) said that we'll be retroactively looking into second accounts. All that post - clearly, I might add - said was that we wouldn't activate clear alt accounts.
URBAN OPEN :)
That ‘Ok fair enough’ was sarcasm, by the way, but thanks VERY much for making public what I thought was a PRIVATE message....
Ok, well, if nobody in authority literally can’t be bothered to keep tabs on fuckwits who have regularly broken the rules time and time again, and continue to do so, then I can’t be bothered to report any bad behaviour in the game. Why the fuck should I bother whenever I try to report anything and I rarely ever get any reply...... Even if I do get a reply, it’s somehow me at fault.
I don't mind multi-accounts if anyone asks me :)
I copy and paste our exact conversation. I thought we cleared this. I'm not going to repeat every week...
Bart — 6/27/2025 4:50 PM
Hi, on his regular ip he can't create new accounts. But when there are no new violations, i don't have the energy to actively hunt anything. The goal for me is to avoid breaking the ToS, not to have a witchhunt.
Mr_Gunman-GB — 6/27/2025 9:57 PM
Ok, fair enough..... 👍
Bart — 6/27/2025 4:50 PM
Hi, on his regular ip he can't create new accounts. But when there are no new violations, i don't have the energy to actively hunt anything. The goal for me is to avoid breaking the ToS, not to have a witchhunt.
Mr_Gunman-GB — 6/27/2025 9:57 PM
Ok, fair enough..... 👍
Teddy, I was referring to the post you made some time ago regarding the multiple accounts policy, here: https://aao25.com/forum/news-82/updated-multiple-account-policy/. />
When Joe was released a few months ago, it was on condition that he can only play with one account (the JoE131 account), so why does he now have access to at least 4 (including his original)? I know at least two of those have been ‘given’ to him by one of his friends in order to circumvent the single account condition that was given to him when he was unbanned. One of those accounts was renamed to a similar username as one of his other friends, to make it look like him and not one of Joe’s alternative accounts. This can only be to further create a greater degree of anonymity. It clearly goes against the single account condition that was given, and it completely contradicts the policy outlined in the attached forum tread, so why is that allowed?
When Joe was released a few months ago, it was on condition that he can only play with one account (the JoE131 account), so why does he now have access to at least 4 (including his original)? I know at least two of those have been ‘given’ to him by one of his friends in order to circumvent the single account condition that was given to him when he was unbanned. One of those accounts was renamed to a similar username as one of his other friends, to make it look like him and not one of Joe’s alternative accounts. This can only be to further create a greater degree of anonymity. It clearly goes against the single account condition that was given, and it completely contradicts the policy outlined in the attached forum tread, so why is that allowed?
He also have lot accounts :D
Yeah gunman is always friedn with bumpy :D
yeah there's that racist guy that always has different names
I could play but Bridge only server is not my thing
old farts playing tonight?
gunman is right! i have notice alot of undercover accounts recently but i never knew it was someone higher up
Gunman, please don't put words in my mouth.
We have never policed the existence of extra accounts. You're pals with multiple people who regularly use multiple.
Our policy is to not allow the creation of new accounts for the same person. Unless it's to do with ban evasion, we don't monitor the use of multiple accounts by a single person. The same rules go for everyone.
We have never policed the existence of extra accounts. You're pals with multiple people who regularly use multiple.
Our policy is to not allow the creation of new accounts for the same person. Unless it's to do with ban evasion, we don't monitor the use of multiple accounts by a single person. The same rules go for everyone.
Using at least 4 or 5 accounts to play undercover. Using a VPN to (try) and hide your identity. You’re only supposed to be using one account and, according to the rules laid out by Teddy, nobody is supposed to be playing undercover to get around bans. You’re lucky you have Assist admin friends who turn a blind eye to this, if any one of us do what you do, we’d be permanently banned in an instant.
using hacks :D
better than the groovy server - banned for no reason- @gunman why am i banned? carmy told me to ask you
urban open :) all players welcome :D
aa tracker net open pool all pppl welcome
Brahva it was simply, "not many players as usual these days" for real
lol now i am curious chron..what was the comment lol hmmm? lol
11 players Extraction!!!
Gunman ready for killing :D
Roger Grizzly, My comment was meaningless anyway. Was curious. Thankks
Chron, which comment are you referring to? All the comments you've made in the shoutbox in the last 24h (3) are still up.
If there's other messages that you sent to the shoutbox, they never made it to our systems.
If there's other messages that you sent to the shoutbox, they never made it to our systems.
lets make hell !
urban open :D
ok 82nd ABD MAPVOTE! added to tracking :D im not assist admin :D
no freddom of speech here,,if u say something assist admins dont like it is removed...no freedom of speech here depends who u r and who u know ..lol..many comment of mine have been erased..and i suspect this ine too lol]
why was my comment taken down? just curious?
3 players urban !
