Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Hey Vegeta you're stupid. Don't be so defensive against evolution, it really doesn't challenge the existence of a God. The dumb stuff in the Bible challenges it more than science.Apparantly
I never spoke on it. I quoted you . once again for an admin you acting really dumb cause your hurt. Quite fascinating reading all the crap you post though keep it going.You're a joke. You didn't quote shit, you just copied it after googling something.
Vegeta neither you provided any proof.Didn't you see him post a bunch of stuff? Don't remember on which of his threads, but he expects you to read hundreds, maybe thousands of pages of stuff for you to be on par with him. And even if you did and disagreed with him, he would still win by default. For whatever reason.
I dont need to copy paste or google what I speak on.
Abstract:
We consider the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equations $u_t + (u_{xx} + u^p )_x = 0,\,t,x \in R,$ in the subcritical and critical cases p = 2,3,4 or 5. Let $R_j (t,x) = Qc_i (x - c_j t - x_j )$ , where $j \in \{ 1,...,N\} $ , be N soliton solutions of this equation, with corresponding speeds 0 < c₁ < C₂ <. . . < $C_N $ . In this paper, we construct a solution u(t) of the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation such that $_{t \to + \infty }^{\lim } \left\| {u(t) - \mathop \Sigma \limits_{j = 1}^N R_j \left\| {_{\scriptstyle \hfill \atop \scriptstyle H1(R) \hfill} } \right. = 0.} \right.$ This solution behaves asymptotically as t → +∞ as the sum of N solitons without loss of mass by dispersion. This is an exceptional behavior, indeed, being given the parameters $\{ c_j \} _{1 \le j \le N} .\{ x_j \} _{1 \le j \le N} .$ we prove uniqueness of such a solution. In the integrable cases p = 2 and 3, such solutions are explicitly known and their properties were extensively studied in the literature (they are called N-soliton solutions). Therefore, the existence result is new only for the nonintegrable cases. The uniqueness result is new for all cases.
It doesn't really matter who wrote it, my answer to it would still have been the same.
Lol what a joke and you are just stupid enough to believe that this dunce (Lord) actully wrote this tripe lol. what a pair of dunces .
Lord you were told at the start dont bring me your copy paste shit here.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightatheism/essays/has-evolution-been-proven/
You are misreading the article, Digital Millennium Copyright Act has been around since 1998.I got the reverse idea by only reading the title as well.
The article I linked to is good news, www.eff.org is trying to add an exception for games that has been abandoned by the developers.
Ok I get this I started a thread on two subjecys you know knowthing about and you feel a little left of so now you want to show everyone how cleaver you are there a clever boy off you go now and start your own thread and see who wants to talk to you. Stop strying to drial my thread as admin you should know better but obviously dont.You're right, I don't know much about this subject (and it's the same for both, don't kid yourself), but my point is, I don't care.
And we havent been here hundreds of thousands of years . But that belongs in the evo threadOh, right, the Earth was created 10000 years ago, I forgot.
Help keep Assist going. Donate to cover our server costs.
