Forum

... remove space between 'AGP_Pawn' and '(Other)'

So, why you are here - with this specific black humor ..? Are you a clown or something?

What a shame ... they do not seized the opportunity ...
... History likes to repeat itself ...

In some aspects I would agree with AAC and TheJohnny, but in this case these aspects has nothing to do with the topic. Here, definitely Spanky is right and - IMO - Shoutbox Usage & Moderation is really the right solution on those who have a tendency to cross the 'thin red line', which is the freedom of speech.
... and it should be applied to the forum as well.

You know this reminds me of some person who got banned in the past for buying a cheat, and then went way into lawyer stuff because of the anticheat system.

His name was something like =IGC=Wolf.

Luckily, that person changed, and he became a nice person who would never want to do that stuff anymore.


In other words, stop annoying us with your personality problem, you give a lot of criticism, but as soon as someone mentions who you are, you go into defense mode and nobody is allowed to mention that.
Stop being 2-faced is my biggest advice for you, it will help you in the future.

Attacking someone, when you has nothing more to say - lack of arguments - is even worse ...

You can't compile native classes - this will break engine integrity (even if you succeed).

Of course the engine is limited! Why else would they move on to a newer one with newer versions of AA?

... because it's easier/cheaper to buy a new engine with bunch of new features, than implement these features in the old one - you missing a point ...
... even AA4 doesn't look better than SC:Blacklist.

Optimsation is just that, optimisation. You can improve preformance, but you can't remove the need for the processor and/or GPU to calculate stuff and with this engine, it's probably impossible to fully optimise features which this engine wasn't built for (i.e maps from AA3).

It's funny you mention CPU/GPU calculation, because the map optimisation is all about ... e.g.
1 test: Make a simple test map, put 10k dynamic lights, run the game and check rendering time (or FPS if you whish).
2 test: Replace all dynamic lights with static, run the game and check rendering time.
3. Now tell me conclusion ... and why ...

And you need to understand that adding anything to the game is much harder than it should simply because we don't have the source for the game.

Well (), believe or not but I have 'some' experiences with game development - especially Unreal Engine based games and how hard (or not ...) it is. That said, you don't need the game source to be able modify game behaviour, extend its functionality or implement new features (I'm not talking about native stuff like rendering etc.). All you need is complete Unreal Script source code, good UDE and compiler.

With that said, I don't think that adding a smarter AI than that which the official devs did would be a bad thing, I just think it's more trouble than it's worth.

Hmm ... With good AI you can have a lot of fun ...
e.g.
Put AI on the empty slots on the server and replace it with the new incoming player ...
... or implement new game mode 'Offline practice', so people can play with AI and gain experience.

... but I prefer Benny Benassi version ...

@Spanky: 'mostly' ..? I see only one guy who was causing the problems, but whatever ...