Forum

ASSIST, AMERICA'S ARMY COMMUNITY - RELIVE THE GLORY DAYS OF AMERICA'S ARMY 2.5

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Ares

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 20
166
Assist Support / Re: Armyops ini not working!
« on: Tuesday, February 25, 2014, 09:25:27 AM »
Don't you have these setting on the monitor itself, Brightness and gamma?
monitor settings rarely give you the same color fill changes as g-card/game settings. Usually just greyish and sharp/dull color changes which appear when you alter the monitor settings.

167
Assist Support / Re: Armyops ini not working!
« on: Tuesday, February 25, 2014, 03:19:16 AM »
There are, or were loads of shit you could change that made it easier on the eyes, made the game run better etc. Being double colorblind (or however you call it in English) there are alot of colors, effects and such that messes with me, so not to gain an unfair advantage, but to get on the same level as everyone else i always did this. I still have it tweaked to get maximum out of my pc, I seriously thought this was common practice.

168
Assist Support / Re: Armyops ini not working!
« on: Sunday, February 23, 2014, 13:33:36 PM »
Only modify settings In either Assist or in AA, don't edit ini's manually.
It's possible to get a Global Permanent ban if you change some settings in the Ini

Goto Install Tab and click on Reset & Repair AA.
That will restore them to normal.
Would be a great idea to post a sticky on the values which, if changed gets you a perm ban..

169
Background Checks / Re: =]PE[=Ketchup...
« on: Sunday, February 23, 2014, 13:30:11 PM »
Yeah, sazerak used to cheat so much himself.

And Ares, I was with you in that same team ;).

TWL, was a bit more strict about it I suppose.
Ye sazerak got caught, circumvented the ban like a boss and played clean the last couple of years, he brought alot of understanding about cheating to the admin scene tho, so it was all good. He kinda made up for the public cheating.
I suppose u were bart, my memory fails me on that one tho. And big sergio, twl was always kinda bad at handling cheaters, directC was a total bitch. And cdc was chaos.

170
Background Checks / Re: =]PE[=Ketchup...
« on: Saturday, February 22, 2014, 15:55:34 PM »
Ares have you anything to do with .ops / vtx Ares?
About your sentence i highly doubt that, everyone knows that TWL and ESL ban only on evidence, even demorecs sometimes weren't enough :/
Yeah I'm him, before that .se and nordbat, even uNk. We did ban people based on demorecs, me sazerak and a few others took the decision after looking at the demos, analyzed the shit out of them, ran them with cheats on our computer which showed exactly what the player saw, and that was the final nail in the coffin. So yes, we did ban without "proof"
The justplay guys were not half as obvious as Ketchup is, so as i said. He'd be banned if it was 3 years ago.

171
Background Checks / Re: =]PE[=Ketchup...
« on: Thursday, February 20, 2014, 05:02:13 AM »
I'm not talking about your team just about your game. Recently did you manage to win because the two primary players could not take part in the Cup. Now we will see in the next cups.

I'm sorry but it's not me trying to prove who is the strength of cheater. Only you , just so you do not know what you're talking.


You seriously might aswell answer me in polish, i'd understand just as much as i do now. I'm not trying to joke on your behalf, I just dont understand what you mean.

172
Background Checks / Re: =]PE[=Ketchup...
« on: Thursday, February 20, 2014, 04:25:40 AM »
Criticize anyone can in your place I'd start of each,because as I see how you play it there's no tactics or aim.
Says the one who lost every match against me and my team. Because of superior tactics and teamplay from us, go sit down son.

As for me, do you have any obsessions in my point.
From my point of view, you have an obsession with me*

No, i just don't like you.

173
Background Checks / Re: =]PE[=Ketchup...
« on: Thursday, February 20, 2014, 03:47:11 AM »
I hate being single-headshotted by Ketchup. He got one of the best aim's of assist at the moment.

But this is a topic for a bg check (which was already done), this is not a threat to put ketchup down and criticize him and tell him his gameplay is stupid and that he doesn' know tactics .
..
And seeing how the last thread was closed because "nothing looked suspicious" having been viewed by someone who don't know what to look for, we discuss it this time.

174
Background Checks / Re: =]PE[=Ketchup...
« on: Thursday, February 20, 2014, 02:21:24 AM »

You are right on the same team with the above mentioned did not play , which does not mean that I have not played against them and by playing against such players can learn a lot.
You obviously didn't learn shit from them, your playinstyle is similar to a seagulls. Meaning you play like a bulldozer, running around oneshotting people in the face with no sense of smartness.

175
Background Checks / Re: =]PE[=Ketchup...
« on: Wednesday, February 19, 2014, 13:02:53 PM »
Here you surprise and played the entire composition epsilon except Parisa after reactivation in EMS.
when there were three last editions of EMS ie 2009-2011 I played with the above does not once.
I really tried understanding this, I really did. You're saying you didn't play with them? Are you using google translate? I played with and against pretty much every active competitive player at some point in scrims, mixes, matches or clans. If that's what you're asking?

Everyone has an opinion it is best to judge because it is easier , a high level of game shows for 4-5  years and only now'm hearing some allegations about my integrity. I emphasize once again the current level of the scene is pathetic. Current my team never  coached , not prepared to match, which shows how the current level of.
If you would have pulled some of the stuff you pull off now, 4-5 years ago, you would have been banned, im sure of it. Having been ESL admin myself, we've banned people for alot less. When a whole community claims someone cheats, they're seldom wrong. And that's proof in itself. You came from nowhere, and trust me, if you'd been this "good" back then, i'd know you from then. Current level is indeed patethic, nothing to add there.
Your team plays a whole lot more scrims than mine, we never scrim. and we all know how it went down in the funcup finals. So climb down from that high horse of yours (this means don't be so fucking cocky when you can't put your money where your mouth is)

176
Background Checks / Re: =]PE[=Ketchup...
« on: Wednesday, February 19, 2014, 10:18:27 AM »
I'll just go ahead and tell everyone the problem with No recoil in AAO25 and why it can't be detected, im not outing anything here since people who knows how to use google can find this anyway.

People use mousemacros, and put them into the ini, or inject them with a program which they toggle, although they think they're supermega smart toggling that shit, it's pretty obvious when you actually feel the diffrence getting shot by a macro and when you're just getting shot by someone normal with recoil (this one goes out to you Ketchup). Since the program ain't always active as an exe, it's near impossible to detect. You can run a check on how many people have the program running, or how many have had it running in the past days/whatever. From what I understand you can neither pinpoint the running exe to a specific player/MAC. So basically, people are free to use it if they know how since it's undetectable. I have tried it, and sure; if you like shooting with the AR in a complete straight line, with no recoil whatsoever, and find this exciting and fun..Go nuts. Or if you you want the challenge the game brings, play normal, learn how to handle recoil and improve yourself.

177
Background Checks / Re: =]PE[=Ketchup...
« on: Wednesday, February 19, 2014, 09:51:34 AM »
wtf are you, I did not know that the Polish players such as: Pawlik, Montrey, Pun, Rmcdzk, and so on in your opinion do not belong up for some of the best, and players from Europe, such as Paris, cesium, Revelino Bart Stone, NMI, heaters and so on, we also have good your opinion?
So in what team did you play with all these players? I know them all, and sure they were good. Paris and cesium being the top ones at their time probably, the rest being counted as moderate. but you never played with these 2, for sure. Or are you talking about who you played against? I don't follow you at all here.

178
Background Checks / Re: =]PE[=Ketchup...
« on: Wednesday, February 19, 2014, 09:34:29 AM »
Everything I accomplished in this game tzn: I play with the best player in europe, i play with the best country in europe , I was winning a lot of online tournaments , but there is one thing that I've always dreamed, which makes'm not satisfied in this game. This is the LAN. I always wanted to take part in it and show people what I can do. I'm looking forward a few years and I hope that I live to see the day in which I will have the opportunity show people how to play at a high level. That's all I wanted to say
Sorry to burst your bubble here Ketchup, but you're kinda wrong. You didn't play with the best player in europe, nor the best country. Take a look at the country championship we had a few years back, when active, good players played. You were not in the team, nor did your country win. Are you even talking about Americas Army? I'd love to play you at a LAN, having been at lans in AA, people usually can't handle not playing on their own pc, with their soundsettings and graphicscard setting, monitor etc. I'd bet my chances that you, with XP sound would fade into nothingness and go with 0 kills. I'm the first one to pat you on the back if you pull of the same shit on a lan which you do in some scrims.

Oh, edit: what did you actually win? What leauge, which teams that have a good roster competed in did you overcome and win? plx share info.

179
General Chat / Re: Maps for our little kiddies
« on: Wednesday, February 19, 2014, 09:15:11 AM »
spanky said he will fix the height but it should be very minimum of limitation for nading, maybe available only on the bridge... There are too many people knowing all the bugs, glitches, tips, tricks how to spam nades etc...the only way i see is some construction needs to be done on bridge
Wait, wait what? If "fix the height" means putting a roof on the map, disabling dropshots..Spanky is out on very thin ice, especially if it goes for all the maps. Dropshots and spams are a big, even a huge part of the game and is what makes it fun. Don't. touch. anything.
(Just for the record, i don't know any spams nor dropshots on bridge)

180
Background Checks / Re: =]PE[=Ketchup...
« on: Wednesday, February 19, 2014, 09:09:17 AM »
Sometimes as I see these posts , I dont  know whether to laugh or cry. If you want and you have the desire to check it daily please really do not have anything to hide. Only sometimes I wonder whether it makes sense to play public I always whether during or
after the game I see something like this. For me it would be too much...
The only thing that illudes me with you ketchup, is that you totally suck donkey ass some rounds, just to turn around and ace a whole team the next round with bs  headshots. You are one of the few players i really fucking hated to play against in this game over the years, not because of your skill, which is terrible; and is shown when you and your team actually try to pull something off together, but because your aim is all you got (or don't have) Having closed the previous topic because
Quote from: spanky
I checked him out earlier today, I see nothing suspicious.
don't really cut it, no offense m8, but you don't know what to look for I belive.

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 20

Download Assist

×

Download Game Client

Important: Battletracker no longer exists. However, old Battletracker accounts may still work. You can create a new 25Assist account here

Download Server Manager