Forum

I'm too hxc to read posts, and in the ones I did read u where all like screenshots from AA3 and AA3 this and I was like, aa2 that aa2 this and spanky wasnt online and I know he missed me, and then I was like aa2 digimon camo this

lolz.

I can't even read that.   And my Gigabyte 990FX AM3+ board is black.

I wrote "usually" for that reason, because there are exceptions indeed. Better than Asus anyway.

https://www.google.it/search?hl=it&q=gigabyte+mainboard&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&biw=1920&bih=947&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=1213T_GAPcSLswblxNDNBA

ya, guess flashes are good for those who fear real gun fights

-.- yeaaah. Why did they even bothered to implement flashes? Wait, why did they even bothered to make weapons, better fight with a stone and a knife. That, that is really manly and masculine.

I would go with the new. See, I'm all for "What if the DEVS instead of going all-new-gameplay in 3.x version just made a few adjustments in 2.x version with a new/old engine?". To make it fresh. To change the game (to make it better) instead of the gameplay.

I'm all for the new.

America's Army in its 2.00 version was released in November 2003, and last patched in April 2009. Considering that is a quite wide live support timelapse for a game, the game actually reached a certain maturity around 2.5 or maybe 2.6.

AA3 probably was in development at least since a couple years before, and by 2009 AA2 reached many limits due to its age. Also, AA2 has some technical limits that are bounded to the software age, and while the engine was probably a powerful tool back in 2003, as of today it's simply outdated in many ways (one of the most obvious ones is the higher load on cpu, due to a low use of the graphic processor power).

Lucky enough, what matters is not just how the game performs but how it actually feels when being played. So, i can't blame the Army for stopping developing AA2 (i would just blame them for stopping supporting it). Blaming over AA3 poor gameplay...well it's going to be 3 years old in July, something has changed, just not as deep as expected. Oh, they made the game actually playable, kudos for that [/sarcasm]

P.s. try take a look at AA3 poor characters animations, then look at the decent, AA2 ones. I can't find one animation that looks natural in AA3. The whole character body seems to be connected in a wierd way...

Truth to be told, i like the "old" woodland/forest camo more than the digi one. On a second thought, there are many more camos available in this version than the woodland camo anyway (e.g. arctic).

P.s. i just noticed you wrote Woodland/desert in the poll description, lol.

Thinking about ti some more, I din't think we could make 2 separate teams, opfor and US army. No matter what you do the enemy will have opfor skins or U.S. skins permanently. I don't think there is a way to alter them based on what team you're on as that is not how the game was made. We can't edit the game code.

Nope. Think of the way it is now, you see the enemy as Opfor and Friendlies as US ones, yep? Heres why:

*wrong statement*

I use CrystalCPUID to undervolt my laptop so I get more battery life and less heat.

Hmmm does that work for mobile i7 cpus aswell? I will look it up