1501
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:14:25 AM »was OJ guilty in ur opinion, should he have gone to jail ?I fail to see how that has anything to do with this situation.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
was OJ guilty in ur opinion, should he have gone to jail ?I fail to see how that has anything to do with this situation.
But investigate and detain them on legal suspicions... those are called warrants.How would that be possible? THERE IS NO PROOF EITHER WAY. That's the entire point of this thread.
GREAT IDEA : Let's do the same here : Temporary bans until proven guilty / innocent
"weak pussy" stands for a way of thinking, not meant for someone in particular.Awful analogy.The cops don't arrest and throw people in jail without proof. Well, they're not supposed to.
The cops say the same, they protect us "for our own good", by force if necessary.
Same here.
Come on, name just one known respected nice old player which banning would have sparkedJust because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it won't in the future.
mass indignation across the community ? There isn't
Every war has its own little % of collateral damage, wouldn't u agree ?This isn't war, it's a fucking video game. Banning legit players will just cause outrage and everyone will quit.
Important is that this war is worth to be fought. And it is. For the sake of the survival of this game.
People will be thankful once the ship has been cleaned from all the rats believe me.
See... you are missing the point, coz this is EXACTLY the weakness that cheaters are trying to exploit,Your point would make sense if we were only banning cheaters without proof. There is just too much room for legit players to get banned. Banning without evidence is an awful idea.
like "I cheat, u don't have proof, booooo, fuck you, i keep on playin"... i say no.
Those backers can support whoever they want, they still never played on the accused guy's PC.You're missing the point. Without proof it's his word against the hacker's. That's dead even. When you have a bunch of other people saying he isn't cheating, that tips it in the banned users favor. That should never happen.
Therefore it's irrelevant. The Anti-cheat authority must not bend under the pressure of some yelling crowd.
Spanky, Pit, Sergio & Me are in favor of the "non hard proof bans"Spanky hasn't said anything.
idk bout Utroda neither BB.
the point is still valid xD, its 4 (or 5) against 3 (or 2) lolnot really. it's 1vs2 right now. The other admins haven't said anything.
How are you getting that? First of all, there are only 7 admins here. Second of all, you, pit, and I are the only ones to post our opinion so far. Spanky just made a bad joke.
hmmm, 9 of 10 admins agree with him on this.
People accusing others of cheating left and right is taking over the forum, while other topics just get buried. It's all drama and stupid bullshit now, wheres the enthusiasm?
Although Major worlds were disrespectfull i think he has a point!He does, but as always, he says it in the most immature way possible.
after removing the drivers i was able to restart into normal windows.Did you install the same ones you previously downloaded or did you download new ones? I would download new ones in case there was something wrong with the previous ones.
However, after reinstalling the nvidia driver, i got the same bluescreen :/