Forum

ASSIST, AMERICA'S ARMY COMMUNITY - RELIVE THE GLORY DAYS OF AMERICA'S ARMY 2.5

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Azerty

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
16
Ban Appeals / Re: GAME STALKING
« on: Friday, February 08, 2013, 06:11:13 AM »
Quote from the shoutbox :"Ganja if you don't mind, please stop sending me PM's. Tired of all your crap, please grow up..."

Mommy i got tked,punish him....loooooool So entertaining and at the same time sad to see where this game went..

Funny sergio listen to such a noob and bann me :d

17
Ban Appeals / Re: GAME STALKING
« on: Friday, February 08, 2013, 02:23:10 AM »
i like ganja, he's a cool cat, never had a promblem with him in game, far as frag rate thats the least thing he plays for, u look at his frag rate says it all.  but i still say that was  sad for a ban on game stalking, lol, shit if any 1 needs to get ban of all people would be the doucebag pit23

Guy he plays ONLY for fragrate. Look his tracker i linked ! He is a big fragwhorenoob.

18
Ban Appeals / Re: GAME STALKING
« on: Thursday, February 07, 2013, 17:22:32 PM »
Yeah I am a stalker :d
Omg nottt. I just followed a ragequitter few times to tk him because he cares much about his frag. Serverhopping, never stay longer then 20 min on same server. Ragequitting after 1st time he got killed.  I just hate him because he has a to big mouth.
Admin better should ban his whoretrackaccaunt. That sort of guys are pathetic. Caring about frag on a almost dead game and calls other player noob.

Then cries like a little boy at admin because his life was almost fucked for few tk's

19
Ban Appeals / GAME STALKING
« on: Thursday, February 07, 2013, 14:08:46 PM »


After almost 40Hours i am still banned. 24 Hours lol why the fuck i am still banned ?

I don't understand why you even ban me .. really

Because I teamkilled a few times Ganja noob the uber ragequitter??


http://battletracker.com/playerstats/aao/827649/Heaven/

20
Background Checks / Re: haterz.gona.hate
« on: Friday, February 01, 2013, 09:04:32 AM »
no i am proud i stopped with it :)

21
Background Checks / Re: haterz.gona.hate
« on: Friday, February 01, 2013, 08:50:42 AM »
idd fishy ass hell.

thx, now i know some acc from te past. I have to stop smoking weed, bec my mind is fucked. Always forget my pw's

22
Background Checks / Re: pit-23 too obvious
« on: Thursday, January 31, 2013, 05:27:44 AM »
Amen

23
Background Checks / Re: pit-23 too obvious
« on: Thursday, January 31, 2013, 04:28:54 AM »
i called you pathetic coz you think ini settings can give you advantage.

in 2.8.5 it was... fastswaphands, onreleasestand... so normally yes, it give you an advantage tweaking ini. But in this version cvars are illegal. But that wasn't my point. Never said that tweaking ini can give you advantage in this version.

24
Background Checks / Re: pit-23 too obvious
« on: Thursday, January 31, 2013, 03:54:48 AM »
ge weet ook wel wa ik bedoel eh bartje, niet te kortzichtig doen é. Nu kunde er idd ni meer veel voordeel uit halen maar in 2.8.5 weet ge ook dat met onereleasestand en fastswaphands and ext.. dat zijn kleine voordelen die ge had met tweaken van ini. maar ik heb nooit gezegd in 2.5, want weet ook dat dit niet meer kan. Ik was aan het veralgemenen.

xxxx

25
Background Checks / Re: pit-23 too obvious
« on: Thursday, January 31, 2013, 03:46:52 AM »
jaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bartjeeeeuh ge hebt gelijk.

Groetje aNobii

26
Background Checks / Re: pit-23 too obvious
« on: Thursday, January 31, 2013, 03:40:22 AM »
never said that you can reduce smoke and smogg with ini. read before you speak:) i mention programs.

i just said that players that use maco's, autohot keys, programs are lame and that everyone has to play with same ini settings so it's a fair war.

-End discussion-

27
Background Checks / Re: pit-23 too obvious
« on: Thursday, January 31, 2013, 03:32:25 AM »
in 2.8.5 i used it. I had different settings and programs. You could reduce the sound and smogg in sf sandstorm, bridge crossing, collapsed tunnel .... isn't that advantage ?

28
Background Checks / Re: pit-23 too obvious
« on: Thursday, January 31, 2013, 03:13:55 AM »
i know that krIz :) ( about an ini can't give you no recoil, faster firerate .. But ini tweaking still give you a little advantage.. why you think players tweak it ... ( especially armyOps.ini ). You guys do what you want, I just give my opinion ( it's allowed, no ???!) calling people pathetic for giving their opinion rofl. I just find everyone has to fight with the same things. it's a fucking free game.


29
Background Checks / Re: pit-23 too obvious
« on: Thursday, January 31, 2013, 02:50:40 AM »
macro and ahk my heroooo !!!

just play like all the other players. fuck ini tweakers, fuck players like you

everyone should play with the same settings...

30
Background Checks / Re: pit-23 too obvious
« on: Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 02:33:04 AM »
sry for my english but I'm nervous.


haha funny that you post this in this topic :)

i would say: pit  :up:

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4

Download Assist

×

Download Game Client

Important: Battletracker no longer exists. However, old Battletracker accounts may still work. You can create a new 25Assist account here

Download Server Manager