Forum

ASSIST, AMERICA'S ARMY COMMUNITY - RELIVE THE GLORY DAYS OF AMERICA'S ARMY 2.5

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Alex

Pages: 1 ... 98 99 [100] 101 102 ... 217
1486
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 22:53:57 PM »
So with that logic someone with good sound will get banned? lmao this is so funny
I guess you missed the smiley face at the end of his post.

1487
Punkbuster is gay. I have nothing more to add, however I'm sure someone around here can help.
Such a helpful post.


What are you getting kicked for?

1488
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 14:24:57 PM »
I say pit should just shut down the game without saying anything and at the same time these forums go down and Nate conveniently changes his MSN name and we pretend like no one was ever so naive to think that this game could live again.
That's weird because there are 100 people playing the game right now. It seems to be alive to me.

1489
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:38:02 PM »
Well seeing as Pit can do everything by himself and has no need to even talk to the other admins about decisions like this, I don't see how I'm needed here anymore. If he wants to go over our heads, then he can be the one who polices the forums, I'm tired of doing it anyways.

1490
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:25:26 PM »
All those account owners PM-ed you/us admitting they are cheaters? No, only the first few did (the "original" accnts). You (and others, including me) banned the others without even spectating them, cause we "knew".
All those account owners? You said you knew they were all accounts of hertz and that feckless guy. I never banned anyone without proof, and feckless actually responded to that thread so it must have been his account. I only banned their 2 main accounts, and none more.

1491
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:04:41 PM »

Seriously, I'm not mad but this is getting funny. I see KiLLaMaN banning without proof too, then he comes and bitches about pit-23 banning some other guy? Is that Orso your friend or what? Lemme show you something:

http://aao25.com/cheater-submission/sad-today-player-blowmy%29-dingdong/

Damn, that's some concrete proof you got there dawg!! Congratz! But, oh wait...
You're an idiot. We have a ton of people complain about them being hackers. As a matter of fact, we KNEW they were hackers, because, try to follow this, THEY TOLD US THEY WERE HACKERS. Of course this was all done by PM because they actually wanted to help us detect the hack if it meant they could still play. We agreed, but then they just kept obviously hacking and I decided it wasn't worth it. So I banned them. There, that's the whole story. Happy?

1492
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 15:55:07 PM »
All admins decisions should be automatically accepted by us.
That is an awful way of looking at things.

1493
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 15:44:30 PM »
I didn't say you agreed. I said you were quiet. Very quiet comparing to what you say now.

Can you just read the verbatim text I wrote, without creating additional intentions I had in mind? My point was not to criticize Jonny. I was writing about the scale of your reaction to my actions, by comparison.
I don't remember exactly what I said, but the likely hood that Jonny was going to go through with it was much less than you, where you already did. His was just a threat, yours was an action.

1494
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 14:55:44 PM »
One more comment regarding the "dictator" thing.

Does any of you remember how Jonny approached the topic of cheating, when he was here? Let me remind you: "if there is undetected hack, I will shut down the authorization". And he was not joking. Well, that makes me look like a "weak pussy" in comparison, doesn't it? I remember me arguing with him, and saying it would be like nuking the whole city because of a few terrorists in there. And I don't remember any of admins protesting then too much.

So shutting down the whole game was OK for you, and now you call me a dictator, because I made a few bans (with some being a _perfect_ hits, if you remember)? I find that funny.
Go find that thread and show me where I agreed with him. Go ahead. I'd love to see it. Not only are you avoiding the argument, but you're now accusing me of doing something I never did.

Also, the whole "the person before me was worse" argument is a very weak one and justifies nothing. The point is that you're compromising the integrity of the game just to "try" to catch a few cheaters. I put try in parenthesis because it isn't certain whether you're banning cheaters or not.

1495
Ban Appeals / Re: Banned D3n@tur@t
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 14:48:23 PM »
"absolute power corrupts absolutely" The player in question shouldn't have to prove anything. Anyone with half a fucking brain should realise that. I don't know this person nor do i care, but banning on what you think, and not what you know just isn't right.
+1

1496
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:50:07 AM »
Well i just tried to add my stone to the discussion, now decide for yourselves,
it will be just fine to me coz i know u guys are reliable.
I'm an admin and I don't even have faith in this decision. Why should anyone else?

Either way, I'm done with this topic until Pit responds, if he responds that is.

1497
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:42:15 AM »
Aren't u contradicting yourself somehow ?
First u state that this is just virtual reality, with no real consequences, but on the other hand
you use the word "banned" as if the person would really banned on some shitty Island...
Well no. the sanction will be just virtual, not able to access game-servers...
That's no drama for the guy, unless he has no real-life.
um, just because it's a game doesn't mean we shouldn't care about falsely banning people. We're taking away entertainment for people, that shouldn't be taken lightly.

 Also, comparing it to murder is extreme and makes little sense, regardless of how you try to spin it.

1498
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:27:09 AM »
i am no worries  :D
What bothers me is that u give the impression that this percentage of collateral damage
will be huge, which is non-sense. The reality is that Pit will eliminate 9 hackers out of 10
people, well sry for the last legit one, at least he will get away with his life  :P
Believe me better that than catching 1 of 10 hackers and see the remaining 9 breaking
bad on our community servers, don't u think ?
1 person wrongly banned is 1 too many.

What I find the most disappointing about this thread is Pit's attitude. Apparently legitimate concerns are now "bitching."

1499
Ban Appeals / Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:21:30 AM »
Everyone knows that he wasted his wife, but there was no "sufficient proof", so he got away with it.
same won't happen here.
I seriously hope you're joking. Comparing a murder case to a video game is laughable.

1500
General Chat / Re: BSOD caused by ctaudio.sys ftw
« on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:16:07 AM »
The ASUS Xonar cards are pretty good, if you absolutely need a card solution: http://www.asus.com/Multimedia/Audio_Cards/Gaming_and_Entertainment_series
But those can get spendy and aren't as good as dedicated external options.

These are pretty popular; http://www.nuforce.com/hp/products/iconudac2/index.php USB input, headphone amp, volume knob, small.

If you're really into quality audio and have some good headphones; http://www.audio-gd.com/Pro/Headphoneamp/NFB12/NFB12EN.htm

Those are just 2 off the top of my head. You can check out this forum to find "gaming" threads:
http://www.head-fi.org/f/46/computer-audio

Here's a couple:
http://www.head-fi.org/t/453916/gaming-audiophiles
http://www.head-fi.org/t/571506/headphones-for-gaming
http://www.head-fi.org/t/605922/best-option-for-gaming-music
http://www.head-fi.org/t/605387/advice-needed-gaming-and-movies-setup


Best advice: take some time & read about it. Head-Fi will teach you a LOT. Don't hesitate to ask questions there.

At $120 that nuforce uDAC-2 is pretty tempting. I need something better than my on-board audio. :P I need to save up as much money as possible for school though. :(

Pages: 1 ... 98 99 [100] 101 102 ... 217

Download Assist

×

Download Game Client

Important: Battletracker no longer exists. However, old Battletracker accounts may still work. You can create a new 25Assist account here

Download Server Manager