Forum

Yes, the developers, especially the ''MAIN'' developer ''ELIZ'' is taking too harsh on the punishment. All i can say is that they look at only one point, they look like selfish and very strong being developers and not even ''thinking'' of giving second chance. Maybe i went here too far, but I must say this because it really disappoints the AA lovers. Admins shouldn't even behave like that with the people.

just wanted to learn more dude I'm 50 years old and just learning how things work no intent on gaining anything except how things work...........

ok so cheaters dont get a second chance, but what about unfair tweakers. for money a second chance?

another aspect i read here is the money earning itself. i think all money, which comes in, should be reinvested into the community. noone should earn any money...
the major aim should be to boost the community.

Few expressed remorse, did you give them a second chance? I guess the answer is no.

Paying a "fee" to be allowed to continue to play the game after being caught cheating would be a nightmare to administer.

Would being caught a second time warrant a higher fee?
Would AutoHotkey be penalized at 50% and a "real" bot at a 100%?

The ONLY upside to a fee/Tag model would be that the few that has been banned would add to the playerbase. But having them in the game with a Tag, would almost certainly drive away at least the same amount of clean players.

If the question  is how do we gain more players, allowing cheaters second chances is a really poor one.

The only good cheater is a banned one....

You sneaky bugger. I just read your post and quoted to reply and you edited your post to include exactly what I was going to say. It's Assist, not AA. Banned cheaters are still very much welcome to play AA without Assist.