Pages: [1] Go Down
Topic: Subject: My Account "[canaglia]Viper" No Longer Exists (Read 36 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: [1] Go Up
Donations
Help keep Assist going. Donate to cover our server costs.
July Goal:
$80.00
Due Date: Jul 31
Total Receipts: $0.00
Below Goal: $80.00
Site Currency: USD
Due Date: Jul 31
Total Receipts: $0.00
Below Goal: $80.00
Site Currency: USD
0%
Play for free!
Download Now
Recent Topics [Unread]
Shoutbox5 in game, 15 online
Apart from that, I think the answer is clear, so we can keep talking in circles, but that's a waste of energy for everybody.
So we know now that you think there are people with assist admin friends who turn blind eyes, we know that you think that your friends would be banned in an instant (FYI, there were friends of you who misbehaved multiple times in the past, but didn't get banned like that), and I see now that even when you clearly had a response, you keep trying on other places again, acting as if you didn't know.
I want to politely ask you to stop that. If someone is creating a toxic environment, we will take action. If there is no current misbehaviour, we do not have the manpower/energy/priority to actively hunt, but we do block the creation of 2nd accounts. That's the final thing, and that won't change.
So please, focus the energy on enjoying the game. And if you see active misbehaviour on servers, report it with screenshots and we will do as it fits.
But if there is no misbehaviour anymore, let it go.
So we know now that you think there are people with assist admin friends who turn blind eyes, we know that you think that your friends would be banned in an instant (FYI, there were friends of you who misbehaved multiple times in the past, but didn't get banned like that), and I see now that even when you clearly had a response, you keep trying on other places again, acting as if you didn't know.
I want to politely ask you to stop that. If someone is creating a toxic environment, we will take action. If there is no current misbehaviour, we do not have the manpower/energy/priority to actively hunt, but we do block the creation of 2nd accounts. That's the final thing, and that won't change.
So please, focus the energy on enjoying the game. And if you see active misbehaviour on servers, report it with screenshots and we will do as it fits.
But if there is no misbehaviour anymore, let it go.
It was probably a bug Tomato. Try logging out of the Assist client and then logging back
lol
Will be there soon, matey! :)
gun you gonna play today, im on ur server
-nx.cuntlight!
mr_tattletale-GB
Who runs the 82nd server??
It's a bit tiring when you keep asking the same thing everywhere while you clearly had a response already.
I wouldn't disclose private messages. In this case I expected that sharing that someone said "Ok, fair enough", wouldn't be any issue nor disclose any information. It was mostly to repeat my previous statement and acknowledge that you already seen it and answered. If you think that's a misinterpretation, then my apologies.
I wouldn't disclose private messages. In this case I expected that sharing that someone said "Ok, fair enough", wouldn't be any issue nor disclose any information. It was mostly to repeat my previous statement and acknowledge that you already seen it and answered. If you think that's a misinterpretation, then my apologies.
Why am I perm banned on 82nd server?
You self-describing there, gunny? Let's try and calm it down. We have never (not even the post you referred to) said that we'll be retroactively looking into second accounts. All that post - clearly, I might add - said was that we wouldn't activate clear alt accounts.
URBAN OPEN :)
That ‘Ok fair enough’ was sarcasm, by the way, but thanks VERY much for making public what I thought was a PRIVATE message....
Ok, well, if nobody in authority literally can’t be bothered to keep tabs on fuckwits who have regularly broken the rules time and time again, and continue to do so, then I can’t be bothered to report any bad behaviour in the game. Why the fuck should I bother whenever I try to report anything and I rarely ever get any reply...... Even if I do get a reply, it’s somehow me at fault.
I don't mind multi-accounts if anyone asks me :)
I copy and paste our exact conversation. I thought we cleared this. I'm not going to repeat every week...
Bart — 6/27/2025 4:50 PM
Hi, on his regular ip he can't create new accounts. But when there are no new violations, i don't have the energy to actively hunt anything. The goal for me is to avoid breaking the ToS, not to have a witchhunt.
Mr_Gunman-GB — 6/27/2025 9:57 PM
Ok, fair enough..... 👍
Bart — 6/27/2025 4:50 PM
Hi, on his regular ip he can't create new accounts. But when there are no new violations, i don't have the energy to actively hunt anything. The goal for me is to avoid breaking the ToS, not to have a witchhunt.
Mr_Gunman-GB — 6/27/2025 9:57 PM
Ok, fair enough..... 👍
Teddy, I was referring to the post you made some time ago regarding the multiple accounts policy, here: https://aao25.com/forum/news-82/updated-multiple-account-policy/. />
When Joe was released a few months ago, it was on condition that he can only play with one account (the JoE131 account), so why does he now have access to at least 4 (including his original)? I know at least two of those have been ‘given’ to him by one of his friends in order to circumvent the single account condition that was given to him when he was unbanned. One of those accounts was renamed to a similar username as one of his other friends, to make it look like him and not one of Joe’s alternative accounts. This can only be to further create a greater degree of anonymity. It clearly goes against the single account condition that was given, and it completely contradicts the policy outlined in the attached forum tread, so why is that allowed?
When Joe was released a few months ago, it was on condition that he can only play with one account (the JoE131 account), so why does he now have access to at least 4 (including his original)? I know at least two of those have been ‘given’ to him by one of his friends in order to circumvent the single account condition that was given to him when he was unbanned. One of those accounts was renamed to a similar username as one of his other friends, to make it look like him and not one of Joe’s alternative accounts. This can only be to further create a greater degree of anonymity. It clearly goes against the single account condition that was given, and it completely contradicts the policy outlined in the attached forum tread, so why is that allowed?
He also have lot accounts :D
Yeah gunman is always friedn with bumpy :D
yeah there's that racist guy that always has different names
I could play but Bridge only server is not my thing
old farts playing tonight?
gunman is right! i have notice alot of undercover accounts recently but i never knew it was someone higher up
Gunman, please don't put words in my mouth.
We have never policed the existence of extra accounts. You're pals with multiple people who regularly use multiple.
Our policy is to not allow the creation of new accounts for the same person. Unless it's to do with ban evasion, we don't monitor the use of multiple accounts by a single person. The same rules go for everyone.
We have never policed the existence of extra accounts. You're pals with multiple people who regularly use multiple.
Our policy is to not allow the creation of new accounts for the same person. Unless it's to do with ban evasion, we don't monitor the use of multiple accounts by a single person. The same rules go for everyone.
Using at least 4 or 5 accounts to play undercover. Using a VPN to (try) and hide your identity. You’re only supposed to be using one account and, according to the rules laid out by Teddy, nobody is supposed to be playing undercover to get around bans. You’re lucky you have Assist admin friends who turn a blind eye to this, if any one of us do what you do, we’d be permanently banned in an instant.
using hacks :D
better than the groovy server - banned for no reason- @gunman why am i banned? carmy told me to ask you
urban open :) all players welcome :D
aa tracker net open pool all pppl welcome
Brahva it was simply, "not many players as usual these days" for real
lol now i am curious chron..what was the comment lol hmmm? lol
11 players Extraction!!!
Gunman ready for killing :D
Roger Grizzly, My comment was meaningless anyway. Was curious. Thankks
Chron, which comment are you referring to? All the comments you've made in the shoutbox in the last 24h (3) are still up.
If there's other messages that you sent to the shoutbox, they never made it to our systems.
If there's other messages that you sent to the shoutbox, they never made it to our systems.
lets make hell !
urban open :D
ok 82nd ABD MAPVOTE! added to tracking :D im not assist admin :D
no freddom of speech here,,if u say something assist admins dont like it is removed...no freedom of speech here depends who u r and who u know ..lol..many comment of mine have been erased..and i suspect this ine too lol]
why was my comment taken down? just curious?
3 players urban !
two player urban !
4 players Aztec!!!
yeah bad map :)
number have been low lately
pool open :) the we made some urbans sets :)
i see 10 pppl :D
16 players SF Pipe!!!
