Forum

As far as individual server rules, the majority of them could easily be implemented globally. The majority of the ones I've seen are don't be an ass, don't spam for the first 30 seconds and stuff like that. Those should be standard rules.

I'm just thinking here in terms of ease of implementation. Remove or empty banlist periodically on Assist and let server admins present a case against a player for a ban issued by Assist admins. It's a whole lot simpler than allowing access for server admins to ban for 2 weeks wherever they see fit. What happens after the 2 weeks is up? They could just ban again. Whereas if it's more of a public witchhunt and non-biased neutral Assist admins can accept/deny the case for a ban, it's a lot simpler. Might bring more people to this website as well.

Spam only affects one type of player. Rusher, Camper are only killed with spam once in a while. I never had a problem with ppl just walking with 203 out of any where Its different for different types of player.

Defence Hill was actually easy to hit without dropshooting from almost every position, but bombing defence side of Central Peak with 5-6 nades while your team was rushing it was fun
I'm pretty sure we had 7, not 6 nades btw.  Yeah, you did the same on early sandstorm

At least I dropshot the RPG on the strykers at sf arctic.

I think the community starts to understand other maps are cool aswell. We don't have to force anything for the moment, just let people play what they want, I see already a lot of players changing their habits, which makes me happy

Been very active these last 2 days , and I was able to play 13 different maps (in 2 days) according to my tracker, which is kinda nice. Plus with the "nightfights" people will learn to play other maps and will learn to enjoy them too.

I think we're on a good way