Forum

ASSIST, AMERICA'S ARMY COMMUNITY - RELIVE THE GLORY DAYS OF AMERICA'S ARMY 2.5

Author Topic: Bans without "hard proofs"  (Read 50073 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline [Majestic]tidididi

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #135 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 07:46:12 AM »
I've missed you Major.

Offline zoxee

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #136 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 09:22:21 AM »
Some ride Pit's dick, some other Skrewy's.

Well dicks taste different, that's life i guess.

I say let pit do what he wants. If his actions help the fall of this game, he has only himself to blame. You forget that he is putting tons of his time into this so i dont think he will let it fail by gaining a reputation of banning innocent people.

this is the best statement made so far regarding the situation btw.
« Last Edit: Friday, August 03, 2012, 10:52:42 AM by zoxee »
First time hot knifing hash oil, sent me to the moon, zombified. Not a whole lot of fun.

Offline Archeh

  • .[Ak4]. Member
  • Dedicated Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 857
    • View Profile
  • AA: Not Cwunk
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #137 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 12:20:13 PM »
What u still posting crap here for ?

I was hoping that I'd get my account suspended for that double post so I can stop checking these forums everyday
Hi I'm Archeh I like too have fun online playing shoot-'em-up video games

Offline Archeh

  • .[Ak4]. Member
  • Dedicated Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 857
    • View Profile
  • AA: Not Cwunk
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #138 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 12:21:11 PM »
it's like my daddy always said:

two double posts in two pages will surely piss off killaman enough for a suspension
Hi I'm Archeh I like too have fun online playing shoot-'em-up video games

Offline Archeh

  • .[Ak4]. Member
  • Dedicated Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 857
    • View Profile
  • AA: Not Cwunk
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #139 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 12:24:47 PM »
900 posts! bai everyone
Hi I'm Archeh I like too have fun online playing shoot-'em-up video games

Offline eKC0mm

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #140 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 12:46:05 PM »
Hia, i have avoided this topic but a post caught my eye.

Quote
We can schedule a match if you want, you will see why we have to ban this way...
Not sure what that means. BUT the TWL ladder has MAYBE 1 potential cheater and that's even a stretch.

As for a more topic related response. I'd say as long as pitt knows what to look for it should be quite easy to find hackers. BUT one has to be careful, because good players may get wrist/flick shots very often and it can be interpreted as an Aimbot if you are spectating it. As long as Pitt is positive he is watching a cheater then idc what he does.

Wallhack is the easiest shit in the world to see when spectating in first person mode btw, specially if the person hacking is stupid.
eKComm - Team Non-Sense

Offline Spanky

  • <?php echo $opinion .' is better.'; ?>
  • Administrator
  • Posts like a Spanky!
  • *
  • Posts: 10,896
    • View Profile
    • NatesComp.com
  • AA: tigobitties
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #141 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 13:25:46 PM »
I say pit should just shut down the game without saying anything and at the same time these forums go down and Nate conveniently changes his MSN name and we pretend like no one was ever so naive to think that this game could live again.

Ever since AAO25 started going downhill, I'm agreeing with Archi a lot more.
It's like shaving your pubes to make your junk look bigger.
Might look bigger, but it aint.....

Offline -NicK.!

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
    • View Profile
  • AA: -Nick.!
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #142 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 13:45:25 PM »
Ever since AAO25 started going downhill, I'm agreeing with Archi a lot more.
You both sound like a broken record.

Offline Spanky

  • <?php echo $opinion .' is better.'; ?>
  • Administrator
  • Posts like a Spanky!
  • *
  • Posts: 10,896
    • View Profile
    • NatesComp.com
  • AA: tigobitties
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #143 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 13:52:54 PM »
You both sound like a broken record.

Then I guess we fit right in with AA because in every aspect of AA, it's the same fucking thing over and over again.
It's like shaving your pubes to make your junk look bigger.
Might look bigger, but it aint.....

Offline Alex

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #144 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 14:24:57 PM »
I say pit should just shut down the game without saying anything and at the same time these forums go down and Nate conveniently changes his MSN name and we pretend like no one was ever so naive to think that this game could live again.
That's weird because there are 100 people playing the game right now. It seems to be alive to me.

Offline zoxee

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #145 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 14:41:23 PM »
That's weird because there are 100 people playing the game right now. It seems to be alive to me.

 :up:
First time hot knifing hash oil, sent me to the moon, zombified. Not a whole lot of fun.

Offline inverseKID

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #146 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 15:27:58 PM »


Wallhack is the easiest shit in the world to see when spectating in first person mode btw, specially if the person hacking is stupid.
The other thing you have to take into account for this game in particular is the effectivness of a good sound card/headset because for an example everyone who plays competitive or has good sound knows where everyone is based on sound alone.

Offline -NicK.!

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
    • View Profile
  • AA: -Nick.!
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #147 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 16:42:46 PM »
The other thing you have to take into account for this game in particular is the effectivness of a good sound card/headset because for an example everyone who plays competitive or has good sound knows where everyone is based on sound alone.
This is false. While they may know the general area, sound will not let you know their exact location. Wallhack is easy to spot because the hacker will often follow the player with his crosshair through the wall.

Then I guess we fit right in with AA because in every aspect of AA, it's the same fucking thing over and over again.
Ya but AA the game doesn't whine and complain as much as you guys do.
« Last Edit: Friday, August 03, 2012, 16:44:19 PM by -NicK.! »

Offline MothaGoosE

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #148 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 16:44:38 PM »
This is false. While they may know the general area, sound will not let you know their exact location. Wallhack is easy to spot because the hacker will often follow the player with his crosshair through the wall.
 Ya but AA the game doesn't whine and complain as much as you guys do.

However:

Offline Spanky

  • <?php echo $opinion .' is better.'; ?>
  • Administrator
  • Posts like a Spanky!
  • *
  • Posts: 10,896
    • View Profile
    • NatesComp.com
  • AA: tigobitties
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #149 on: Friday, August 03, 2012, 16:55:00 PM »
everyone who [...] has good sound

I promise that nobody in the vintage AA community has "good sound".
It's like shaving your pubes to make your junk look bigger.
Might look bigger, but it aint.....

 

Download Assist

×

Download Game Client

Important: Battletracker no longer exists. However, old Battletracker accounts may still work. You can create a new 25Assist account here

Download Server Manager