Forum

ASSIST, AMERICA'S ARMY COMMUNITY - RELIVE THE GLORY DAYS OF AMERICA'S ARMY 2.5

Author Topic: Bans without "hard proofs"  (Read 50219 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MothaGoosE

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #75 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 15:56:38 PM »
That is an awful way of looking at things.

Agreed.

Offline [Majestic]tidididi

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #76 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 15:58:58 PM »
That is an awful way of looking at things.

Like I said- you spend your free time to take care about everything. You don't have salary. All what you have is flock of screaming sheeps every day and whole day.

You all were selected especially for this project. You have a credit of confidence.

Few words about politic- democration is the biggest shit ever made. 1 decision > 100 ideas.

And one valuable Stalin quote- "One death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic"

One banned possible cheater is a tragedy; but more is just a statistic.
« Last Edit: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:02:42 PM by [Majestic]tidididi »

TheBlackGinger

  • Guest
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #77 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:01:32 PM »
Damn these admins banning without proof...



Show me proof? Ain't got one? LOL THEN UNBAN ME NOW!!

Seriously, I'm not mad but this is getting funny. I see KiLLaMaN banning without proof too, then he comes and bitches about pit-23 banning some other guy? Is that Orso your friend or what? Lemme show you something:

http://aao25.com/cheater-submission/sad-today-player-blowmy%29-dingdong/

Damn, that's some concrete proof you got there dawg!! Congratz! But, oh wait...

As of now, I'm still getting banned without proof on a daily basis. Is that a bad or a good thing? You tell me, it doesn't bother me to be honest.

Apparently, for some it isn't. So, if you ever will unban some random guy caught in the same way you ban me, I'm going to demand an unban too.

You (pit) and I know that I cheat, but: "It's not what you know, but what you can prove in court!" (Law Abiding Citizen)

Either you approve what pit-23 is doing, or with this "show me proof" rule you're gonna have a baaaad time :p
« Last Edit: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:03:24 PM by TheBlackGinger »

Offline zoxee

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #78 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:02:31 PM »
This crusade would make sense for a game with a lot of players

Whatever... maybe u right. This isn't worth the energy.
First time hot knifing hash oil, sent me to the moon, zombified. Not a whole lot of fun.

Offline zoxee

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #79 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:04:06 PM »
democration is the biggest shit ever made

you mean democracy right ?  :D
First time hot knifing hash oil, sent me to the moon, zombified. Not a whole lot of fun.

Offline Alex

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #80 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:04:41 PM »

Seriously, I'm not mad but this is getting funny. I see KiLLaMaN banning without proof too, then he comes and bitches about pit-23 banning some other guy? Is that Orso your friend or what? Lemme show you something:

http://aao25.com/cheater-submission/sad-today-player-blowmy%29-dingdong/

Damn, that's some concrete proof you got there dawg!! Congratz! But, oh wait...
You're an idiot. We have a ton of people complain about them being hackers. As a matter of fact, we KNEW they were hackers, because, try to follow this, THEY TOLD US THEY WERE HACKERS. Of course this was all done by PM because they actually wanted to help us detect the hack if it meant they could still play. We agreed, but then they just kept obviously hacking and I decided it wasn't worth it. So I banned them. There, that's the whole story. Happy?

Offline [Majestic]tidididi

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #81 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:06:14 PM »
Yes, democracy. My fault.

One word for BlackGinger:

You aren't stupid gay. You are smart. Why the fuck you use fucking cheats in fucking video games? Just tell me.

You found some gay net friends and you are all happy because of making shit. It's kindergarden.

Offline MothaGoosE

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #82 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:09:26 PM »
Damn these admins banning without proof...



Show me proof? Ain't got one? LOL THEN UNBAN ME NOW!!

Seriously, I'm not mad but this is getting funny. I see KiLLaMaN banning without proof too, then he comes and bitches about pit-23 banning some other guy? Is that Orso your friend or what? Lemme show you something:

http://aao25.com/cheater-submission/sad-today-player-blowmy%29-dingdong/

Damn, that's some concrete proof you got there dawg!! Congratz! But, oh wait...

As of now, I'm still getting banned without proof on a daily basis. Is that a bad or a good thing? You tell me, it doesn't bother me to be honest.

Apparently, for some it isn't. So, if you ever will unban some random guy caught in the same way you ban me, I'm going to demand an unban too.

You (pit) and I know that I cheat, but: "It's not what you know, but what you can prove in court!" (Law Abiding Citizen)

Either you approve what pit-23 is doing, or with this "show me proof" rule you're gonna have a baaaad time :p

The problem is this thread is about the new banning policy, not what admins have done in the past, pit included. Post this somewhere else.

TheBlackGinger

  • Guest
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #83 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:18:55 PM »
@KiLLaMaN: "people told me", "I saw you", "I spectated you" are not hard proofs, which is what you are trying to achieve right? Banning only on hard proofs. Happy? As I said, I dont give two shits about it, I can still play whenever I want.

@MothaGoosE: don't know if trolling or just stupid. Try to read this thread's title: Bans without "hard proofs". That's what this thread is about. My bans were without proof. Get it now? Also, past bans? I could do one now, play, get banned without proof again and come back here if you would like.

Offline pit-23

  • Loyal Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 760
    • View Profile
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #84 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:19:22 PM »
You're an idiot. We have a ton of people complain about them being hackers. As a matter of fact, we KNEW they were hackers, because, try to follow this, THEY TOLD US THEY WERE HACKERS. Of course this was all done by PM because they actually wanted to help us detect the hack if it meant they could still play. We agreed, but then they just kept obviously hacking and I decided it wasn't worth it. So I banned them. There, that's the whole story. Happy?

All those account owners PM-ed you/us admitting they are cheaters? No, only the first few did (the "original" accnts). You (and others, including me) banned the others without even spectating them, cause we "knew".

What I'm doing is controversial, sure, but at least I'm trying to be coherent. You couldn't be more contradicting yourself, with what you wrote in that quote above.
« Last Edit: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:21:50 PM by pit-23 »

Offline MothaGoosE

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #85 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:22:40 PM »
What I'm doing is controversial, sure, but at leat I'm trying to be coherent. You couldn't be more contradicting yourself, with what you wrote in that quote above.

Yeah that's a mild way of putting it. More like wrong.

Offline Alex

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #86 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:25:26 PM »
All those account owners PM-ed you/us admitting they are cheaters? No, only the first few did (the "original" accnts). You (and others, including me) banned the others without even spectating them, cause we "knew".
All those account owners? You said you knew they were all accounts of hertz and that feckless guy. I never banned anyone without proof, and feckless actually responded to that thread so it must have been his account. I only banned their 2 main accounts, and none more.

Offline [Majestic]tidididi

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #87 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:26:56 PM »
Feckless and Anti.Pro are two forum users who hack.

Offline zoxee

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #88 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:31:18 PM »
What I'm doing is controversial, sure, but at leat I'm trying to be coherent. You couldn't be more contradicting yourself, with what you wrote in that quote above.

Even if u guys consider what Pit is doing as fucked up, it's always soooooooo easy to criticize when
you're not in charge... wtf u want, take his place ? well do it, but pls stop camouflaging your intentions
under that purity and justice-for-all BS, it just stinks.

Just like in politics, as long as someone's in the opposition, they talk about how the government is doin BS,
promises new hopes, milk honey and work for all but as soon as the come to power, they act exactly
as their predecessors or even worse... because they have to face reality.

I guess if we had a "weak pussy" in charge, the hacker problem would be much greater today.
First time hot knifing hash oil, sent me to the moon, zombified. Not a whole lot of fun.

Offline Alex

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #89 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 16:38:02 PM »
Well seeing as Pit can do everything by himself and has no need to even talk to the other admins about decisions like this, I don't see how I'm needed here anymore. If he wants to go over our heads, then he can be the one who polices the forums, I'm tired of doing it anyways.

 

Download Assist

×

Download Game Client

Important: Battletracker no longer exists. However, old Battletracker accounts may still work. You can create a new 25Assist account here

Download Server Manager