Forum

ASSIST, AMERICA'S ARMY COMMUNITY - RELIVE THE GLORY DAYS OF AMERICA'S ARMY 2.5

Author Topic: Bans without "hard proofs"  (Read 26336 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alex

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #30 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 00:43:13 AM »
Come on, name just one known respected nice old player which banning would have sparked
mass indignation across the community ? There isn't
Just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it won't in the future.

Offline zoxee

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #31 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 00:45:39 AM »
Just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it won't in the future.

Which brings us back to Pit. He is not stupid and i trust he adult judgement.
And if one day he really turns megalomaniac, abuses his power,
we will simply overthrow him  :makemyday:

For the time being, we need a strong, decisive guy who goes thorough into the matter.
Not some weak pussy.
« Last Edit: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 00:56:02 AM by zoxee »
First time hot knifing hash oil, sent me to the moon, zombified. Not a whole lot of fun.

Offline Spanky

  • <?php echo $opinion .' is better.'; ?>
  • Administrator
  • Posts like a Spanky!
  • *
  • Posts: 10,893
    • View Profile
    • NatesComp.com
  • AA: tigobitties
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #32 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 00:55:19 AM »
Not some weak pussy.

Hear what he called you Killa? What are you going to do about that huh? Isn't that against the rules? Banhammer? Post deletion? :)
It's like shaving your pubes to make your junk look bigger.
Might look bigger, but it aint.....

Offline zoxee

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #33 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 00:58:30 AM »
Hear what he called you Killa? What are you going to do about that huh? Isn't that against the rules? Banhammer? Post deletion? :)

"weak pussy" stands for a way of thinking, not meant for someone in particular.
The cops say the same, they protect us "for our own good", by force if necessary.
Same here.
First time hot knifing hash oil, sent me to the moon, zombified. Not a whole lot of fun.

Offline Alex

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #34 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:00:31 AM »
"weak pussy" stands for a way of thinking, not meant for someone in particular.
The cops say the same, they protect us "for our own good", by force if necessary.
Same here.
Awful analogy.The cops don't arrest and throw people in jail without proof. Well, they're not supposed to.

Offline zoxee

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #35 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:01:49 AM »
Awful analogy.The cops don't arrest and throw people in jail without proof.

But investigate and detain them on legal suspicions... those are called warrants.

GREAT IDEA : Let's do the same here : Temporary bans until proven guilty / innocent  :D
« Last Edit: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:04:01 AM by zoxee »
First time hot knifing hash oil, sent me to the moon, zombified. Not a whole lot of fun.

Offline [Majestic]tidididi

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #36 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:05:13 AM »
But investigate and detain them on legal suspicions... those are called warrants.

GREAT IDEA : Let's do the same here : Temporary bans until proven guilty / innocent  :D

Banned people will go to Strasbourg.

Offline Possessed

  • bWpnRecoil == False;
  • Administrator
  • Epic Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 3,620
  • You suffer, but why?!
    • View Profile
  • AA: Possessed
Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #37 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:05:58 AM »
But investigate and detain them on legal suspicions... those are called warrants.

GREAT IDEA : Let's do the same here : Temporary bans until proven guilty / innocent  :D
tidididididididididi  :style:
These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.
John 16:33


Offline zoxee

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #38 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:10:18 AM »
tidididididididididi  :style:

we already decided : he will be chartered to lapland and work as a carpenter at santa's gift-storage facility :D
First time hot knifing hash oil, sent me to the moon, zombified. Not a whole lot of fun.

Offline Alex

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #39 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:11:10 AM »
But investigate and detain them on legal suspicions... those are called warrants.

GREAT IDEA : Let's do the same here : Temporary bans until proven guilty / innocent  :D
How would that be possible? THERE IS NO PROOF EITHER WAY. That's the entire point of this thread.

Offline zoxee

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #40 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:12:40 AM »
How would that be possible? THERE IS NO PROOF EITHER WAY. That's the entire point of this thread.

was OJ guilty in ur opinion, should he have gone to jail ?
First time hot knifing hash oil, sent me to the moon, zombified. Not a whole lot of fun.

Offline Alex

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #41 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:14:25 AM »
was OJ guilty in ur opinion, should he have gone to jail ?
I fail to see how that has anything to do with this situation.

Offline zoxee

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #42 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:16:42 AM »
Everyone knows that he wasted his wife, but there was no "sufficient proof", so he got away with it.
same won't happen here.
First time hot knifing hash oil, sent me to the moon, zombified. Not a whole lot of fun.

Offline Alex

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #43 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:21:30 AM »
Everyone knows that he wasted his wife, but there was no "sufficient proof", so he got away with it.
same won't happen here.
I seriously hope you're joking. Comparing a murder case to a video game is laughable.

Offline -NicK.!

Re: Bans without "hard proofs"
« Reply #44 on: Thursday, August 02, 2012, 01:21:54 AM »
Everyone knows that he wasted his wife, but there was no "sufficient proof", so he got away with it.
same won't happen here.
Without proof you have nothing, without proof all there is to go by is your own feelings. I dont care if you think OJ was guilty or not, it turned out they did not have proof to convict him so they did not. That is how bans here should work. Banning people without proof is basically the admins saying "We think you are hacking, we cant prove it, but we run this game now so you cant do anything about it" And I for one dont think that is a good reputation for these admins to have.

 

Download Assist

×

Download Game Client

Important: Battletracker no longer exists. However, old Battletracker accounts may still work. You can create a new 25Assist account here

Download Server Manager