Nice review, though I would amend your ranking of the graphics to 10-For a WII game. Because any ps3 title blows SMG2 out of the water.
Graphics aren't only about realistic textures and lighting and all that shit. Graphics also involves things such as art style
I think we can all agree that the Wii's draw isn't graphics. I hope that PS3 Move will be successful in combining the draw of the Wii with the draw of the PS3.
Hell, I'd pay an extra $70 to have them remove the sphere.
It uses the sphere to track the motion of the controller. It's supposed to change color to be most visible in the current environment.
I know why it is there, I just hate the look of it.
Copy copy copy. Who cares who did it first? What matters is implementation. Sony could make a crappier version or a much better version. If they can pull it off, PS3/4 might be the best console out.
Who's to say Sony hasn't been planning this since the prior to the Wii release? It's pretty unlikely but the release of the Wii could have made them have to start from scratch to make something superior.
one for aiming and the other for moving
I would like to see an explination of another way to make motion controls without "copying" the Wii.
What ever your reason for defending the the WII you cannot argue that the PS3 and even the 360 are better consoles. And you also cannot argue they are all shit compared to a PC.
@ blue. It's called innovation. Microsoft is doing motion controls in a different way. Instead of copying what has already been done, one should create a new and better way to do something. I have no idea what that might be, but people are getting paid big bucks to think of these things, I'm not.
So in your opinion the WII is better. But from an objective view the 360 and PS3 both are capable of far more than the WII (the PS3 more so than the 360) and the PS3 shipped with motion controls. Just because you play your WII more than 360 doesn't mean its better. All it means is you are one of the people that finds that type of crap fun. The WII is targeted to pre-teens and seniors and it does a good job of entertaining their target demographics. The graphics the WII has are limited the controls are not precise in the least and worse of all very few of the WII games seem to be targeted at adults. Nintendo has been milking the Mario series for 20 years. Now I am not saying that's a bad thing they are making money hand over fist but you speak of innovation, I seem to recall the EyeToy which gave motion control over the game in the PS2.....hmm who is copying who now.
So in your opinion the WII is better. But from an objective view the 360 and PS3 both are capable of far more than the WII (the PS3 more so than the 360) and the PS3 shipped with motion controls. Just because you play your WII more than 360 doesn't mean its better. All it means is you are one of the people that finds that type of crap fun. The WII is targeted to pre-teens and seniors and it does a good job of entertaining their target demographics. The graphics the WII has are limited the controls are not precise in the least and worse of all very few of the WII games seem to be targeted at adults. Nintendo has been milking the Mario series for 20 years. Now I am not saying that's a bad thing they are making money hand over fist but you speak of innovation, I seem to recall the EyeToy which gave motion control over the game in the PS2.....hmm who is copying who now.
hahaha. This post made my day. Instead of making a huge post about how you are wrong in every way, I will just leave it to this.
There is no way to judge if a console is "better" than another one. It is all up to one's opinion. You can try to convince me all you want, but the Wii is better than the 360 to me, and that is all that matters.
So in your opinion the WII is better. But from an objective view the 360 and PS3 both are capable of far more than the WII (the PS3 more so than the 360) and the PS3 shipped with motion controls. Yeah, crappy sixaxis controller motion controlls Just because you play your WII more than 360 doesn't mean its better. I never said it was better as a fact. I said it was better to me. All it means is you are one of the people that finds that type of crap fun. Calling Wii games crap seems a bit childish, don't you think? It's all about opinion, I'll take a Mario game over a generic FPS any day The WII is targeted to pre-teens and seniors and it does a good job of entertaining their target demographics. Just because it is targeted to a specific group doesn't mean its use should only be in that group. I find Wii games to be enjoyable for all ages. The graphics the WII has are limited the controls are not precise in the least and worse of all very few of the WII games seem to be targeted at adults. Graphics do not equal a good game, the controls are much more percise than an anolog stick, and who cares what audience the games are for if they are fun? Nintendo has been milking the Mario series for 20 years. If the games are still fun and refreshing, I welcome new installments in a series. Now I am not saying that's a bad thing they are making money hand over fist but you speak of innovation, I seem to recall the EyeToy which gave motion control over the game in the PS2.....hmm who is copying who now. Eye toy is a completely different form of motion control.
You know I now know why Dann posted that post he posted. I am here trying to have a debate about consoles and the responses are asinine. It is sad. And yes there is a way to judge which console is better. The fact that you don't understand that basic fact makes me sad.
Its not the posts on an internet forum that make me sad its the realization that most people in the world can't grasp thoughts that are -in my mind- very basic.
And yes there is a way to judge which console is better. The fact that you don't understand that basic fact makes me sad.
Knight said the responses are said. Responses contain ideas and arguments. Posts contain ASCII characters.
And yes there is a way to judge which console is better. The fact that you don't understand that basic fact makes me sad.
Back this up and I will believe you. What makes the PS3 better than the Wii? It is all debatable and up to personal opinion. There is no official way to judge what console is better.
And yes there is a way to judge which console is better. The fact that you don't understand that basic fact makes me sad.
Back this up and I will believe you. What makes the PS3 better than the Wii? It is all debatable and up to personal opinion. There is no official way to judge what console is better.
I have no desire to sift around the internet for facts, now if you wish to enlighten yourself that is up to you.
$60 just to play online now? I'll pass.Aren't you talking about pretty much every current game?
Either you have motion control with no hand controls (360 or eye toy), or your hand (everything else). Not much of a spectrum in which people can make something and not have people scream "copier!" at them.Yea, you can either use a camera to track an object with reflective surfaces / infrared LED's or you can use an accelerometer in a device.
yes there is a way to judge which console is better.Right. The consumers do that by purchasing a console they enjoy. Having never even touched a Wii, Xbox (regular or 360) or PS3, I won't talk out my ass, I'll just post facts:
Back this up and I will believe you. What makes the PS3 better than the Wii? It is all debatable and up to personal opinion. There is no official way to judge what console is better.Hmmm, one step ahead of you I guess.
Personally, I think a nice vegan carrot cake is a wonderful dessert. Unfortunately, facts state that more people eat pie and as such, Americans think that it is better and that's a fact. How asinine of me to like carrot cake.Carrot cake sucks. Dutch Apple Pie is the best. It's all American, how can you beat that?
but you can say, the ps3 has better capability's to produce more realistic looking graphics.
Spanky presents:
The ThreadEnder!$60 just to play online now? I'll pass.Aren't you talking about pretty much every current game?
That just helps prove my point. Instead of buying another game, you have to pay to play online. I would much rather have the money to buy a game than to pay Microsoft for something that should be free.
That just helps prove my point. Instead of buying another game, you have to pay to play online. I would much rather have the money to buy a game than to pay Microsoft for something that should be free.
Oh, I obviously have no idea how that stuff works. I thought you were talking about game prices which are outrageous.
Hell, I'd pay an extra $70 to have them remove the sphere.lol, my bunny removed my sphere for me...chewed it into pieces... amazingly, still works.
love folfing on there.