AAO25.com
Community => The Lounge => Topic started by: Dialects on Tuesday, October 12, 2010, 19:38:20 PM
-
Oh so you just wear sunglasses indoors all the time then. Ok.
In this specific picture, yes, I was wearing sunglasses. We had just arrived home and neither me nor him took thought of taking the glasses off, due to distraction or laziness. I've taken pictures in the past where I do make this or that expression just for the fun of it. This wasn't one of those, that's all. Whether or not you believe me is irrelevant to the realism and validity of this fact. However, if you do feel like mocking me about posting an updated picture of myself in which I carelessly had glasses on, then I might have missed the purpose of this thread, completely; even when I was the one coming up with it. On a slightly more dramatic note, I might even been misunderstanding the whole concept in which e-relationships are based on, for that matter.
tl;dr - Fuck off for not having taken the time to read my post and replying accordingly.
-
In this specific picture, yes, I was wearing sunglasses. We had just arrived home and neither me nor him took thought of taking the glasses off, due to distraction or laziness. I've taken pictures in the past where I do make this or that expression just for the fun of it. This wasn't one of those, that's all. Whether or not you believe me is irrelevant to the realism and validity of this fact. However, if you do feel like mocking me about posting an updated picture of myself in which I carelessly had glasses on, then I might have missed the purpose of this thread, completely; even when I was the one coming up with it. On a slightly more dramatic note, I might even been misunderstanding the whole concept in which e-relationships are based on, for that matter.
tl;dr - Fuck off for not having taken the time to read my post and replying accordingly.
Wow, way to blow a joke way out of proportion.
-
Yea, I was joking about tryin to look cool. But the sunglasses bit, it seems like in every picture/video you are wearing them.
-
I'm thinking about getting my hair cut short, I'm not really sure though.
I will be cutting my hair short here soon. We should do it together.
-
Yea, I was joking about tryin to look cool. But the sunglasses bit, it seems like in every picture/video you are wearing them.
In "most" of my recent videos/pictures (most is in quotation marks due to the simple fact that not even 50% of the pictures I've taken or videos I've shoot have me on sunglasses) I have indeed wore glasses for "coolness" purposes. However true (and yet insignificant) as that may be, I do indeed use sunglasses whenever the weather so requires, and carry on with using them even when I'm on the tube and whatnot. One could argue it is to show off. Personally, it's either because A) I am lazy to take them off or don't even realise I still got them on B) I don't get bothered by the fact that I might be wearing them out of reason --Furthermore, it somewhat seems to have become a image-brand of mine, as I'm sure each and every one of you has one specific thing they constantly wear, or a specific facial expression, and so on. It's called character, or at least that's how they usually go about it.
Killa - If you're not going to contribute to the thread, I suggest you go ride a horse. They taste good and are of apparently big proportions too.
tl;dr - Then again, fuck off for not reading the entire post.
(I am going to start adding tl;dr on all my posts.)
-
I once saw Dann without shades on. It was beautiful.
-
Killa - If you're not going to contribute to the thread, I suggest you go ride a horse. They taste good and are of apparently big proportions too.
Fuck you. I posted a pic two posts ago. You probably missed it because you were too busy sucking dick and acting like a douche bag.
-
DAYUUUUM GUUURRRL.
-
DAYUUUUM GUUURRRL.
My sentiments exactly.
-
DAYUUUUM GUUURRRL.
My sentiments exactly.
See, every time I say something along those lines this is the response I get. Every time dann acts like a douche, which is a lot, people just ignore it and act like it is not a problem. I'm sick of having to deal with his stupid shit every other day. That is not why I come to this site. he can't take a fucking joke and all of the sudden I'm the one out of line. Makes perfect sense.
-
Fuck you. I posted a pic two posts ago. You probably missed it because you were too busy sucking dick and acting like a douche bag.
Rational Explanation: Your picture was literally chocked up onto your "LMAO" post. It was edited in, and not originally posted. You should know by now that, in an active conversation, edits are often not paid attention to. Especially when a new page (11th) is created on top of that. It just adds up to the possibility of your edit not becoming utterly alerting or paid attention to, as it should have. Moreover, if we take a close look at the edit times, you will realise your edit came a minute after my post generated the 11th page. Then again, it is only natural that I was not aware of your picture being posted.
Word Usage: It is quite interesting how you have indeed, managed to use the following all in one sentence alone: "Fuck you; sucking dick; douche bag" --Is this the kind of behaviour you would like to see from others? Whereas I might have a slight problem with your display of intelectual throughout your posts, I am yet to become highly hostile and offensive towards yourself. The connotation given to "go ride a horse" has none but a literal sense to it. The denotation, however, as to the way you perceive meaning, might have been completely overtwisted -of which I am not responsible for. At any rate, your attitude has only contributed further to the already established, and dare I say quite accurately-proven, idea I have of your own self.
P.S:. More yummy cranky nonsensical hysterical and superfluously hideous display of Killa's attitude ---Yay!
Every time dann acts like a douche, which is a lot, people just ignore it and act like it is not a problem. I'm sick of having to deal with his stupid shit every other day. That is not why I come to this site. he can't take a fucking joke and all of the sudden I'm the one out of line. Makes perfect sense.
-
I might have a slight problem with your display of intelectual throughout your posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY_amJ0YZrM
I'm staying out of this one but I couldn't pass up the opportunity.
-
Rational Explanation: Your picture was literally chocked up onto your "LMAO" post. It was edited in, and not originally posted. You should know by now that, in an active conversation, edits are often not paid attention to. Especially when a new page (11th) is created on top of that. It just adds up to the possibility of your edit not becoming utterly alerting or paid attention to, as it should have. Moreover, if we take a close look at the edit times, you will realise your edit came a minute after my post generated the 11th page. Then again, it is only natural that I was not aware of your picture being posted.
I actually started to edited the post before you made a new post. You obviously posted while I was editing it. I don't compare times of random posts. I just assumed your post came after.
Word Usage: It is quite interesting how you have indeed, managed to use the following all in one sentence alone: "Fuck you; sucking dick; douche bag" --Is this the kind of behaviour you would like to see from others? Whereas I might have a slight problem with your display of intelectual throughout your posts, I am yet to become highly hostile and offensive towards yourself. The connotation given to "go ride a horse" has none but a literal sense to it. The denotation, however, as to the way you perceive meaning, might have been completely overtwisted -of which I am not responsible for. At any rate, your attitude has only contributed further to the already established, and dare I say quite accurately-proven, idea I have of your own self.
P.S:. More yummy cranky nonsensical hysterical and superfluously hideous display of Killa's attitude ---Yay!
As for the entire second half of your post, it is complete bullshit. Typical Dann being Dann. You hide your idiocy behind words and phrases that aren't often used to make yourself sound smart and try to confuse the average person. In other words, you say stupid shit but the way you word it makes you sound smart and makes people second guess themselves. I'm not saying that it is necessarily your fault that people don't understand you, but it sure works out in your favor.
-
Ive got to step in and say Dann doesn't try and sound smart.
-
Can we all just the fuck up
I agree with mans.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY_amJ0YZrM
I'm staying out of this one but I couldn't pass up the opportunity.
You know far too much, Archi : )
As for the entire second half of your post, it is complete bullshit. Typical Dann being Dann. You hide your idiocy behind words and phrases that aren't often used to make yourself sound smart and try to confuse the average person. In other words, you say stupid shit but the way you word it makes you sound smart and makes people second guess themselves. I'm not saying that it is necessarily your fault that people don't understand you, but it sure works out in your favor.
How can one be stupid and sound smart? On top of that, how is it that I would be able to sound credible and genuine at being smart, if I were to be stupid? Furthermore, how would have I managed to get accepted into one of the best University of Arts in Europe with both written and oral interviews on subjects I had never, up until then, have to expose systematically in English? Could you possibility be imposing that the tutors were deceived elusively by my actings? No, they weren't, I'm afraid. That couldn't possibly happen, as it is not naturally within one's true character. Most ironically, even if that was to be the case, would that not mean that however possibly stupid I was to be, I would of still manage to intentionally outsmart all of my Tutors and Admission Staff, into thinking great of me?
I can not seem to work my head around your argument, nor to make any sense out of it. Miscommunication, perhaps --or maybe-- if I were to act according to your behaviour and logic, it is you the reason I can not understand you, for you -however stupid as you may be- manage to work your sentence structure and grammar application to a level far beyond an average's person understanding? Speaking of average, were you not the one to say there's no such thing as an average person...Lack of continuity in thought exposure is, more often than otherwise, a sign of pretentious behaviour. In other words, and as proven by none but your own lack of integrity and continuity, it is you whose smartness has been faked or is, at this present moment, fake. Revertible tables?
Be aware that I am not accusing you of being smart, stupid, pretentious, false or any of the subsequent adjectives that might have been undetermined through my words and manner of speech. No -I would rather not cross that line as I lack both the knowledge and the will to do so; as well as the courage to go against my principles, even when heated up. Throughout this post, hypothetically, I've shown you how tricky it might be to set standards and base accusations therefrom.
Let's not mention I am a self-taught Englishman and that my primary language is Portuguese...No, let's not go into that. It would be a rather relevant ironic fact to bring about, though, to be fairly honest.
tl;dr - Almost forgot to add this one up. Basically, keep posting pictures, unless Killa has anything of relevance to add up to my post.
-
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg400.imageshack.us%2Fimg400%2F8329%2Fpspulpasiankid5bl.jpg&hash=f7695b6755c411af6ba279f3d900ada5)
-
Killa, if you do not come to defend your argument, yours will eventually collapse and loose viability to stand still, despite the level of nonsense that lies within.
-
Killa, if you do not come to defend your argument, yours will eventually collapse and loose viability to stand still, despite the level of nonsense that lies within.
In other words, Dann demands satisfaction and challenges you to a duel!
-
Killa, if you do not come to defend your argument, yours will eventually collapse and loose viability to stand still, despite the level of nonsense that lies within.
I went to bed right after my last post. I have something called school that I must attend every weekday at 7:00am.
How can one be stupid and sound smart? On top of that, how is it that I would be able to sound credible and genuine at being smart, if I were to be stupid? Furthermore, how would have I managed to get accepted into one of the best University of Arts in Europe with both written and oral interviews on subjects I had never, up until then, have to expose systematically in English? Could you possibility be imposing that the tutors were deceived elusively by my actings? No, they weren't, I'm afraid. That couldn't possibly happen, as it is not naturally within one's true character. Most ironically, even if that was to be the case, would that not mean that however possibly stupid I was to be, I would of still manage to intentionally outsmart all of my Tutors and Admission Staff, into thinking great of me?
I can not seem to work my head around your argument, nor to make any sense out of it. Miscommunication, perhaps --or maybe-- if I were to act according to your behaviour and logic, it is you the reason I can not understand you, for you -however stupid as you may be- manage to work your sentence structure and grammar application to a level far beyond an average's person understanding? Speaking of average, were you not the one to say there's no such thing as an average person...Lack of continuity in thought exposure is, more often than otherwise, a sign of pretentious behaviour. In other words, and as proven by none but your own lack of integrity and continuity, it is you whose smartness has been faked or is, at this present moment, fake. Revertible tables?
Be aware that I am not accusing you of being smart, stupid, pretentious, false or any of the subsequent adjectives that might have been undetermined through my words and manner of speech. No -I would rather not cross that line as I lack both the knowledge and the will to do so; as well as the courage to go against my principles, even when heated up. Throughout this post, hypothetically, I've shown you how tricky it might be to set standards and base accusations therefrom.
Let's not mention I am a self-taught Englishman and that my primary language is Portuguese...No, let's not go into that. It would be a rather relevant ironic fact to bring about, though, to be fairly honest.
tl;dr - Almost forgot to add this one up. Basically, keep posting pictures, unless Killa has anything of relevance to add up to my post.
I never said you were stupid. I said that you say idiotic things. Nowhere did I comment on your over all intelligence, just the intelligence that you display in your posts. Maybe you misinterpreted what I was saying or maybe I didn't do a good enough job explaining it. I said that you say idiotic stuff, but the way you word it makes it sound very smart. This is probably due to the complexity of the sentences you use. A lot of people, including myself, speak and type a very basic English, using rather small sentences and basic ideas. You on the other had, are much more complex with your English. Even to the point what I think you know more about English than me. People usually aren't ready to read complex English and misinterpret a lot of what was said. This also works in your favor if you say something rather stupid or silly, because people will just skim through it and assume you are right because of the complexity of your sentences. I never tried to say you are bad at English, you are indeed VERY good.
Just concluding my point, I never meant that you were not smart, only that you post stupid things that sound smart due to the English you use.
-
I went to bed right after my last post. I have something called school that I must attend every weekday at 7:00am.
So do I, in one of the most demanding Universities of Europe in Arts. Is this relevant information, though? Not really. It's good to know we're both studying and enriching ourselves, though.
I never said you were stupid. I said that you say idiotic things. Nowhere did I comment on your over all intelligence, just the intelligence that you display in your posts. Maybe you misinterpreted what I was saying or maybe I didn't do a good enough job explaining it. I said that you say idiotic stuff, but the way you word it makes it sound very smart. This is probably due to the complexity of the sentences you use.A lot of people, including myself, speak and type a very basic English, using rather small sentences and basic ideas. You on the other had, are much more complex with your English. Even to the point what I think you know more about English than me. People usually aren't ready to read complex English and misinterpret a lot of what was said. This also works in your favor if you say something rather stupid or silly, because people will just skim through it and assume you are right because of the complexity of your sentences. I never tried to say you are bad at English, you are indeed VERY good.
Just concluding my point, I never meant that you were not smart, only that you post stupid things that sound smart due to the English you use.
Everything is relative. On that basis, any and all dialogue is subject to the relativeness of what is or has been truly intended, therefore portrayed, in words. What does this mean? It means that for a complex concept to make sense, there needs to exist a coherent sense of belief and credence to it, that is neither illusive nor progressive, as otherwise, the relativeness of said concept will more likely be interpreted wrongly --depending on the needs of a certain occasion-- and simultaneously, its meaning sub-judged. In other words, and simply put, it is nowhere safe to assume what I say is, eventhough put out eloquently and intelligently, hideous and nonsensical (i.e:. Stupid). I am either smart or stupid. There is no way I can be smart and say stupid things simultaneously, as neither is it possible for stupid people to come out genuinely smart.
Discussions, however the circumstances, are often a brief dogma to which we can hardly remain abstained to. In said discussions, moods often suffer radical changes, depending on what is being said, read and interpreted by both individuals and that certainly plays an important role on the outcome of the discussion(s) at subject. Contrastingly, if met with maturity, serenity and receptivity, discussions are bound to healthy enrich yourself and stray away from negative outcomes, whatever those may be. With that in mind, how could it make any sense for me to try to elucidly (to knowledgeably attempt to) compromise one's perception as a scheme to turn the odds to my side? No. You are wrong to think so. I don't play smart, and indeed, I am very much human --In the sense that I too, do wrong, repent, commit and above all, interpret things wrongly--, therefore I am naturally at wrong somewhere down this discussion, as so are you.
What set us apart is the way we approach each other and in what term and level of severity we critic each other. Therein lies a big difference, one that I am incapable of breaking down nor the slightest bit. Whatever steers you to act that way is something I have absolutely no need or willingness to understand or even come in contact with. I've decided not to intrinsically lurk around such a pattern of actions and behaviours, albeit my ability to contain myself and distant from the moment, analytically. It is common sense to understand that such actions will, more often than otherwise, be far more consequent than one could ever expect. Consequence begets consequence, change begets change, heat begets heat, bliss begets bliss, and so on. No. I will not go there and act that way. That's not the right path for me. I've been there, done that, seen that and I've concluded that is not a lifestyle I am keen to take on.
I don't pretend anything. Ever. After all, I'm quite the blunt and honest lad, regardless of the circumstances and the inadequacy that might lie therein.
-
So do I, in one of the most demanding Universities of Europe in Arts. Is this relevant information, though? Not really. It's good to know we're both studying and enriching ourselves, though.
Everything is relative. On that basis, any and all dialogue is subject to the relativeness of what is or has been truly intended, therefore portrayed, in words. What does this mean? It means that for a complex concept to make sense, there needs to exist a coherent sense of belief and credence to it, that is neither illusive nor progressive, as otherwise, the relativeness of said concept will more likely be interpreted wrongly --depending on the needs of a certain occasion-- and simultaneously, its meaning sub-judged. In other words, and simply put, it is nowhere safe to assume what I say is, eventhough put out eloquently and intelligently, hideous and nonsensical (i.e:. Stupid). I am either smart or stupid. There is no way I can be smart and say stupid things simultaneously, as neither is it possible for stupid people to come out genuinely smart.
Discussions, however the circumstances, are often a brief dogma to which we can hardly remain abstained to. In said discussions, moods often suffer radical changes, depending on what is being said, read and interpreted by both individuals and that certainly plays an important role on the outcome of the discussion(s) at subject. Contrastingly, if met with maturity, serenity and receptivity, discussions are bound to healthy enrich yourself and stray away from negative outcomes, whatever those may be. With that in mind, how could it make any sense for me to try to elucidly (to knowledgeably attempt to) compromise one's perception as a scheme to turn the odds to my side? No. You are wrong to think so. I don't play smart, and indeed, I am very much human --In the sense that I too, do wrong, repent, commit and above all, interpret things wrongly--, therefore I am naturally at wrong somewhere down this discussion, as so are you.
What set us apart is the way we approach each other and in what term and level of severity we critic each other. Therein lies a big difference, one that I am incapable of breaking down nor the slightest bit. Whatever steers you to act that way is something I have absolutely no need or willingness to understand or even come in contact with. I've decided not to intrinsically lurk around such a pattern of actions and behaviours, albeit my ability to contain myself and distant from the moment, analytically. It is common sense to understand that such actions will, more often than otherwise, be far more consequent than one could ever expect. Consequence begets consequence, change begets change, heat begets heat, bliss begets bliss, and so on. No. I will not go there and act that way. That's not the right path for me. I've been there, done that, seen that and I've concluded that is not a lifestyle I am keen to take on.
I don't pretend anything. Ever. After all, I'm quite the blunt and honest lad, regardless of the circumstances and the inadequacy that might lie therein.
You need to quit this bullshit. You always have a rather simple point but the way you express it is WAY too long and drawn out. Get to the point, don't just sit around bullshitting for half of the paragraph. For this one, I honestly have no idea what your point even is.
-
First Paragraph: Explains the impossibility -as well as the variants and attributes therein- of there being any genuine stupidity covered by fancy facts in what post. The pretence.
Second Paragraph: Explains the complexity of a discussion, in which mood, grammar, words, sentence structure, metaphors, leve of intelligence, distance from feelings, analytical power (and more...) all take a big part in the suggested outcome.
Third Paragraph: Explains what is one of the most visible and biggest difference in us, and covers a bit of what may be the consequences of it. It also explains a bit of why I think your attitude is, in my understanding, wrongful; and how I too, have behaved very closely to how you behave in discussions (written-wise).
You should (Note how I didn't say need, I said should instead! Less arrogance, less hypocrisy and way easier form of communicating with others is not thinking you can or can not tell them what they need or need not to do.) stop telling me what I need to do, and how I need to go about my thoughts, and how I need to start exposing them. You should also, in my opinion, (Knowing the reader know what is ahead of him is but an opinion helps him avoiding getting stressed out with it, as well as aid for a safer interpretation!) stop categorising my post's contents -thus a part of me- as bullshit. If you could (A rather formal yet smooth way to approach someone's issue and present them to what you think -note that I've specified the presence of oneself's sense of thought- could be a solution) avoid fault language in your posts, I am sure that would help keeping the discussion to respectful terms and provide less distortion, feeling and reaction wise.
-
OK, let me rephrase that then in a more "politically correct" manner.
It would be easier to read and understand your posts if you kept them precise and straight to the point. You often use words, phrases, and sentences that add very little meaning to your overall point. In my opinion, your posts would be much better and easier to read without all of the useless words and phrases.
-
mans: Agreed. Whenever I do that, though, I get misunderstood. Maybe it is because I think in some sort of different way to others. Nor better nor worse, just different. On another topic, what games are you playing currently? I might just join up at a random day and have a few laughs in Ventrilo or so.
Killa: The slight "notes" I added to my post and their intent have nothing to do with political approaches. It's just a godfuckingdamn common sense to try to avoid arrogance and ignorance when talking to someone else, unless of course it is in your intent to instigate others. I don't often use words, phrases and sentences that add very little meaning to my overall posts, no. What I do is, I specifically pick what I want to say so that the integrity of what I am saying is preserved. I can certainly agree my posts would be easier to read if they were shorter, but better... arguable. Yet again, you couldn't end up a post without demising the importance of what I say now, could you? No. Because since you think those extra words and phrases are useless, you do ought to attend to the urge of categorising them as useless and acting unpleasantly.
This is it. I have given up. From this time onwards, Killa, you shall be Mr.DumbBunny.
-
This is it. I have given up. From this time onwards, Killa, you shall be Mr.DumbBunny.
Gotta love the hypocrisy. ::) Are you full of bullshit all of the time or just half of the time?
-
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.insidesocal.com%2Ftomhoffarth%2FMisc-Dumb_%28Bunny%29.jpg&hash=beefcd7211f63f1f5107c372c8fd6b27)
-
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.insidesocal.com%2Ftomhoffarth%2FMisc-Dumb_%28Bunny%29.jpg&hash=beefcd7211f63f1f5107c372c8fd6b27)
Thank you very much for further proving my point.
-
Mr.DumbBunny's present today!
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fltceow.blu.livefilestore.com%2Fy1pYw2LF3OSlrGc3jJj1W8fJ0b8P4iPCGWThEnSTHe4DMVgqzi3F3whGksUqjvylToOfwdQ1AtJ6wyN_eg0cuyGg-NC0P3dCnjT%2Fmisinterpretation.jpg&hash=3f0ef354ec88f50c13e0e2e3f0d59cfc)
-
Such....awful....insults.....
It is good to know that I finally broke the guy who always talked of "being mature and acting with respect."
-
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fhome.mchsi.com%2F%7Ebeyondbelief%2Fthisshit.jpg&hash=95add773120c95a4d478c7cd759b916f)
-
It would be easier to read and understand your posts if you kept them precise and straight to the point. You often use words, phrases, and sentences that add very little meaning to your overall point. In my opinion, your posts would be much better and easier to read without all of the useless words and phrases.
IOW (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=IOW), be moar American plz.
-
Dann is laughing at you killaman. He went from tomes to pictures. Not a great sign on the internet.
-
Dann is laughing at you killaman. He went from tomes to pictures. Not a great sign on the internet.
What do I care if he laughs at me over the internet?
IOW (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=IOW), be moar American plz.
Your use of "moar" is alarming considering your anti-Ak4 talk stance.
-
Your use of "moar" is alarming considering your anti-Ak4 talk stance.
I said it because my whole post was sarcasm. Trying to use silly acronyms and words to add even more sarcasm, I guess it didn't work.
On a more serious note Killaman, maybe you can loosen up a bit, it seems like your asshole is puckered up tighter than a snare drum.
-
I actually support Dann's Brief way to describing his point.
Guys like him are usually hired to make Professional Letters, Documents, Rules, Guidelines etc....
If you are going to have trouble getting through his way of speaking, You will surely be 'fucked up' in life when you encounter such situation's.
Think of this as Practice...
-
Vik, it's awesome that you're getting in on these discussions a bit :) Nice to see you took the time to read and have an opinion.
Skrewy, fuck the miners. It's just like the military (maybe another discussion?) where they go out there knowing what can happen and then bitch and moan when something does happen.
mans, while I disagree, I must admit that I didn't read most of it either.
-
^^ These m8's have it right.
-
Vik, it's awesome that you're getting in on these discussions a bit :) Nice to see you took the time to read and have an opinion.
Skrewy, fuck the miners. It's just like the military (maybe another discussion?) where they go out there knowing what can happen and then bitch and moan when something does happen.
mans, while I disagree, I must admit that I didn't read most of it either.
I don't recall the miners ever "bitching and moaning" about being down there. Most of the people are happy to see them get out alive as this is the first time a rescue has been done at such depths. Yes, they technically "know" it can happen, but there is an extremely low chance that it ever will.
-
incorrect
theres a low chance it will happen on such a scale it will gather the worlds attention but u would be shocked how many people get maimed and killed that u dont hear about
Yes, mining is dangerous, but most mining disasters do not have to deal with a mine collapse, but rather a gas explosion that kills many people. 90% of the U.S. metal material that is mined comes from surface mines that are not even underground.
There were, approximately 717,000 wages workers in the U.S. mining industry in 2008.(http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs004.htm#emply)
In 2008,50 people died in mining accidents.(http://www.msha.gov/fatals/fab.htm)
50/717,000 = around 0.00006
I was surprised at how hard it was to find data about mining. I know there are obvious flaws with the numbers, but they are the best I could find.
-
Actually theres 100% chance of something going wrong because you can't catagorize and deduce statistical evidence from the minds of people. However it isn't reliable to think that way :)
-
Australia, where we land on the wrong beach but fight the cunts any way.
lol'd lots