yes, go on please. and make all maps, even the [mAAp] free to play.
why not, realy?
we all are adult's (ok, not all - but the most). so we can decide be ourself witch map we would like to play.
do so, i dosn't hurt, for sure not!
Well, as I see this topic, some non-competition player called pit already knows exactly what he is talking about, so not much more for me to say.
/sarcasm.
To give a honest answer to this, if you want to do this, in that case you need both teams to agree on playing those maps, instead of both picking one. And I for one does not mind if you both agree on playing other maps then you should if both teams agree. However this is what I say as an individual, not as member of the admin team. I as an individual was also against picking SF Recon in the standard maplist because not everybody got the time to play for 2 and a halve hours since you got 2 maps to play.
That being said, if the rest of the admins do want it, I have to let them do it, it's just the way it works I guess.
So if it was up to me, I would have made the maplist smaller, but put in the option to let both teams agree on playing other maps. However this would make it for the admin team a lot harder to administrate and it might give some biased endscore results compared to others who have to play more defense sided "draw-maps".