AAO25.com

Community => The Lounge => Media & Art => Topic started by: Spanky on Friday, April 29, 2011, 03:34:38 AM

Title: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Friday, April 29, 2011, 03:34:38 AM
Kody was generous and passed on his "old" camera to me, it replaced my incredibly aging and failing Sony DSC-S600 so it was quite an upgrade. This thread will be a tip of the hat to Kody as none of these pictures (or the fun had while taking them) would be possible. Thanks Kody.

First off, a couple choice pics from the last few days:
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF7323.JPG&hash=754465bf9edd84982aef1b026aac6b7b)
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF7398.JPG&hash=811f1cba91fe42d58d9c350afd705436)
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF7570.JPG&hash=f1435a54e9cd6adb47d6f82908cd6f9e)

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: BlueBlaster on Friday, April 29, 2011, 16:04:46 PM
The photos look nice. Nice focus on the bird in the first one and the second one reminds me of those old windows vista wallpapers. The third one would benefit from trying some hdr on it.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Tuesday, May 03, 2011, 23:15:40 PM
Just taken:
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF7749.JPG&hash=a39125880ab9a2629b8d3342c7ffcb9b)
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Knight on Wednesday, May 04, 2011, 00:43:46 AM
My favorite so far. They are looking good. How much post are you doing on these?
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Wednesday, May 04, 2011, 01:16:23 AM
My favorite so far. They are looking good. How much post are you doing on these?

Thanks. No Photoshop work, straight off the camera and onto Dropbox.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: BlueBlaster on Wednesday, May 04, 2011, 23:43:12 PM
Looks good negro.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 00:06:10 AM
Back in from having loads of fun taking pics at sunset. One of my more favorite ones:
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF7765.JPG&hash=88d7f8112cb30d01cdb9e998d1610eed)
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Knight on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 01:24:32 AM
I like it, it would be nice if some thing in the foreground was visible though. It would give the pic a sense of scale.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 02:52:08 AM
I'll aim for that next time :)
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 03:22:59 AM
^^ Made me smile.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: BlueBlaster on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 15:10:45 PM
They look like wisps.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Jared on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 15:49:41 PM
with sunset try opening your aperture this will create a good sense of depth 
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 16:26:13 PM
with sunset try opening your aperture this will create a good sense of depth 

Aperture bugs the fuck out of me. I can read up on it but when I need it, I don't know what the fuck the numbers mean. Backwards shit pisses me off. </rant>
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Jared on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 16:49:04 PM
lol i think my post was backwards too, lol i can't remember now if its open or closed for greater sense of depth
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 16:51:52 PM
lol i think my post was backwards too, lol i can't remember now if its open or closed for greater sense of depth

Wikipedia:
The size of the stop is one factor that affects depth of field. Smaller stops (larger f numbers) produce a longer depth of field, allowing objects at a wide range of distances to all be in focus at the same time.

So, small f stop numbers for more blurry objects for great sense of depth?
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 19:28:47 PM
While I was taking that last sunset picture, an owl came by within 60 feet or so and started hooting:
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF7795.JPG&hash=be0ef6bf9f7f3d1d1e9344571de36e8b)

Unfortunately he didn't stay there long enough for me to fidget with the settings AND get a nice picture without him moving. He flew off and landed in a tree, I had to use a good 4-5 second exposure to get him:
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF7801.JPG&hash=aac8a23bd64d3229bfb1a94bd7c4b6c4)
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 22:35:55 PM
Just took a quick shot through the window with some bad settings but came up with some amazing color:
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF7814.JPG&hash=7f36df04f06db20d5dcba3af15238fad)
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: BlueBlaster on Thursday, May 05, 2011, 23:50:12 PM
Wikipedia:
The size of the stop is one factor that affects depth of field. Smaller stops (larger f numbers) produce a longer depth of field, allowing objects at a wide range of distances to all be in focus at the same time.

So, small f stop numbers for more blurry objects for great sense of depth?

I think it's larger f-stops for greater sense of depth. Depending on what your shooting, things closer or further away will be out of focus so you'll know at what depth objects in the shot fall in.

I think. Also nice multi-colored turkey (jk) you caught there.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Knight on Friday, May 06, 2011, 00:35:43 AM
Open=more light
better DOF=LOWER NUMBER
Closed=less light
sharper image= HIGHER NUMBER.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: BlueBlaster on Friday, May 06, 2011, 02:32:35 AM
LOL, Spanky boy, what did you edit on that post?
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Friday, May 06, 2011, 03:20:43 AM
lol I just broke it up. It was all bunched together.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Knight on Friday, May 06, 2011, 04:03:23 AM
Right now \/\/\/\/\/\/\/Look down\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ That thread is all you need to know starting out.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Tuesday, May 10, 2011, 02:49:52 AM
Latest a hydrophyllum capitatum:
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF7897.JPG&hash=904deca4368ab7ce5df41799f95978f3)
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Jared on Tuesday, May 10, 2011, 18:38:19 PM
I really like the lighting. Maybe more dof.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Tuesday, May 10, 2011, 19:25:12 PM
I really like the lighting. Maybe more dof.

Thanks. The sun was setting and I was changing settings like mad so I could cherry pick the better exposures when I got back inside. That was shot with Aperture priority at f/2.8 and saturation boost on the camera. I like the details of the fuzzy leaves.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Monday, May 16, 2011, 20:03:37 PM
Update:
I got sooooo pissed off with AF and macro while trying to take these. I dozens and dozens of pics and scrapped 90% of them just because they weren't even close to being focused. In the end I just put AF on with continuous shooting and moved the camera forward and back to get a wide variety of focusing. Anyway, here's the one I like the most:
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF8249.JPG&hash=8e832f6eb8bc723793ded6d655da40c1)
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: BlueBlaster on Monday, May 16, 2011, 21:33:56 PM
Looks like a beast bro. It's hard to describe what I think of the photo; but it looks happy :D
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Monday, May 16, 2011, 21:35:47 PM
Thanks :) It was pretty random and I was in a bad mood but perseverance pays off! The more I look at it, the happier I am with it :)
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Jared on Tuesday, May 17, 2011, 09:42:52 AM
I really like this, good color, nice sense of depth. +1
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Dialects on Friday, May 20, 2011, 05:53:17 AM
Closed = Bigger and better DoP (Depth of Field) < Light
Open = Less DoP > Light

The Aperture scale is a constituted by the multiples of two scales.

A. 2.4/2.6/2.8
B. 3.5/3.7
A. 4
B. 6.4/7.2
A. 8
B. 12
A. 16
AB. 22
B. 24

P.S:. There are slight changes from camera to camera, as there are from type-1 lens to type-2 lens (where type-1 and type-2 indicate or apply to any different type of lenses, regardless of what their type is.), which is why some of the stops of the scale can vary (i.e:. 2.4/2.6). Some cameras/lenses will have 2.4, some other will have 2.6, and so on. Scale A is multiples of 2, whereas scale B is multiples of 3. There non-rounded numbers, such as 2.4 or 6.4 exists because of the imperfection between the several apertures --not because the apertures were/are done imperfectly, but because in such a small measurement, it is hard to concise so much light-information that stays true and relevant to reality, through such a small aperture. It's a bit more complex than this, and I haven't got much time to explain the rest.



P.S.S:. Just realised this has already been answered to. Oh well.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Monday, June 20, 2011, 23:49:37 PM
2 more to add to my collection:
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF9426.JPG&hash=cd03e76fb0831cd84f2cab0100160660)
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F464376%2Fheadshot%2FDSCF9437.JPG&hash=77d8698fc325bfaf5bf85ecf16589790)
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Jared on Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 11:04:38 AM
really like the first one! nice job!
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Spanky on Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 13:18:43 PM
Thanks :) Looking at it now, I probably should have tried a flash, at least to see how it would look since the flower is not illuminated very well.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: Thor on Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 14:09:44 PM
that is beautiful !! very nice.
Title: Re: Spanky's photo gallery
Post by: BlueBlaster on Thursday, June 23, 2011, 20:14:12 PM
The flower doesn't need flash :D