AAO25.com

America's Army => mAAp Project => Topic started by: MothaGoosE on Tuesday, September 11, 2012, 23:10:24 PM

Title: SF_Contingency
Post by: MothaGoosE on Tuesday, September 11, 2012, 23:10:24 PM
I'm no longer an active player, but I'd still like to finish this project before I truly go. A few people expressed interest in this map before, so I'm wondering if it is worth it to tie up this loose end.

To any admins "in the know," if I do finish this project, how much time before the next supposed "map update" would I have to complete the project?

Also, I was initially granted permission to include this map to the update by Blueblaster and Spanky, but I'm not sure if that carries over since Assist is under new management.

Either way, if the map is included (which I would prefer) I hope this map could potentially change the way users see the [mAAp] pack. Thanks, everyone.
Title: Re: SF_Contingency
Post by: BiG_SerGiO on Wednesday, September 12, 2012, 05:05:54 AM
You have at least 1 month till the next Release and ofc it will still be included, with that quality it deserves :)
Title: Re: SF_Contingency
Post by: alechko1 on Wednesday, September 12, 2012, 05:41:22 AM
I like how you demagogically wrote the only two choices in the poll.
A person can conclude that if someone isn't interested in your specific map, it means that he isn't interested in any other new content too
Title: Re: SF_Contingency
Post by: BiG_SerGiO on Wednesday, September 12, 2012, 05:49:03 AM
The poll is only about this map and you aren't obliged to vote ;)
Title: Re: SF_Contingency
Post by: alechko1 on Wednesday, September 12, 2012, 05:57:06 AM
I know that, I'm just saying that "No, I'm not interested in new content" option is too broad.

It should be :"Yes" or "No"

With the same success he could have made "No, I don't want this game to exist anymore", would you still say that this poll is only about this map?

P.S.
Although I have to say that I appreciate the effort MothaGoosE invested in this map in order to bring something new to the game
Title: Re: SF_Contingency
Post by: God on Wednesday, September 12, 2012, 07:48:33 AM
just do it and we will see if it`s good or not ;) good luck !
Title: Re: SF_Contingency
Post by: teddy_grizzly_bear on Wednesday, September 12, 2012, 08:38:26 AM
just do it and we will see if it`s good or not ;) good luck !
We've already seen it, its pretty good, I think it only needs a few bugs worked out or something.

Did anyone manage to test it on a server with a bunch of people to see if it was fair for both teams (both teams getting to obj X at the same time and so on, I mean what goose posted he had intended for the map)?
Title: Re: SF_Contingency
Post by: [Majestic]tidididi on Wednesday, September 12, 2012, 08:39:16 AM
We don't need new maps. But I voted YES. Don't ask me why- I don't know.
Title: Re: SF_Contingency
Post by: MothaGoosE on Wednesday, September 12, 2012, 09:48:13 AM
Thanks for the feedback, guys.

I'll finish it within the month, Thanks, Sergio. :)

Also, to alechko1, the option, in this case, is not broad because no new content besides maps can actually be implemented to the game. Assist can change and have new features, but the game will remain the same. The idea was that if you're interested in new content, then why not have some new maps? It doesn't hurt you or require any effort on your part. I hope that clears it up.

Thanks again, guys, and I'll get back to work.