AAO25.com
America's Army => General Chat => Topic started by: ^^UnDiSpUtEd^^ on Sunday, June 17, 2012, 04:51:13 AM
-
Think carefully before you vote, your cast is very important. You can only vote once so think very carefully in improving AA. I'm an old player who seeks for changes to AA. Why? Because I'm bored of playing the same thing every single day. Are you not bored of AA? We can start develop this game into more realistic to the army. We can finally start developing the game and make so much so we bring not a hundred people but much more. Are you not tired of using the same tactics, same strategies, dieing from spammed nades, dieing the same way. This is a way to start everything again. I played for many years and trust me playing this every single day for many years is getting boring. If we accept into developing AA so we can play it again and have fun and also bringing more players.
This is what jonny wanted to develop the game but it seems that so many players don't even get the feeling of playing this for years and johnny thought about wasting his time for not developing. He wanted to work and develop.
He might get back one day when he sees that this game is getting developed.
This is your opportunity to make AA better.
P.S Read topics - BF- Conquest Objective for AA - http://aao25.com/maap/bf-style-conquest-objectives-for-aa/msg25749/?topicseen#new (http://aao25.com/maap/bf-style-conquest-objectives-for-aa/msg25749/?topicseen#new)
P.S Read topics- Radio reports - http://aao25.com/general-chat/radio-reports/msg25753/?topicseen#new (http://aao25.com/general-chat/radio-reports/msg25753/?topicseen#new)
They might help you in voting.
-
Yes. I trust you about your moves.
-
I hate to burst the bubble here but you need to treat each change differently. This seems like a poll for "update AA. yes? no?". Not just a poll for a specific feature. It needs to be per-feature, because some people will like some features and others won't.
To add onto this, there needs to be a discussion on whether or not it's ok to modify gameplay of existing maps. It's already established that fixing bugs is fine in regular maps but modifying core gameplay is another discussion all together.
-
I don;t get your idea, you can do it then?
-
I never played Bridge Crossing lately, and Spanky's right, you should ask for each map (honestly i doubt there will be a positive feedback about modifying those maps). It would really be great if there were more players like you.
-
Well I must be a conservatist then. IMO we shouldn't improve maps, we should just advertise better the non popular maps. Still not gonna vote
-
Ganja you seem not to understand, why would you like to play this the same thing over again and again? it was like this all these years and had not changed in-game at all. But this community can let their hands on this development and construct a very good game. Community should work without asking people about this, they got assist back and they work on it to produce best quality. If we let them work then we get what we want a real army game experience.
-
Ganja you seem not to understand, why would you like to play this the same thing over again and again?
I bet you haven't played more than 10 maps on AA ...
People can choose if they want to play same or not, feel free to play other maps, use other tactics, other guns, with other enemies and friendlies. Damn it's never the same
-
Ganja you seem not to understand, why would you like to play this the same thing over again and again? it was like this all these years and had not changed in-game at all. But this community can let their hands on this development and construct a very good game. Community should work without asking people about this, they got assist back and they work on it to produce best quality. If we let them work then we get what we want a real army game experience.
First of all as cool as change would be I'm not sure how much we can actually change. Making maps and doing a few tweaks sure but increasing graphics and changing gameplay noticeably might not be that easy and maybe not even possible. Also the whole reason this game is still around is because people love it. Look what happened when the Devs tried to change it (AA3) It killed off 90% of the community. Changing things too much now would kill off whats left of the game IMO.
-
First of all as cool as change would be I'm not sure how much we can actually change. Making maps and doing a few tweaks sure but increasing graphics and changing gameplay noticeably might not be that easy and maybe not even possible. Also the whole reason this game is still around is because people love it. Look what happened when the Devs tried to change it (AA3) It killed off 90% of the community. Changing things too much now would kill off whats left of the game IMO.
I completely agree with Max. People still play this game because of the classic maps. The only thing I agree with fixing in those maps are fixing issues, bugs, exploits etc. To keep you from being "bored" new maps need to be developed (which spanky, max, killa, blue and whoever else are doing so). Changing existing maps isn't going to fix anything but piss people off. Making new versions of the maps are a good idea but completely changing the original will not go over well. Me personally I'm excited to see what the mAAp people have to offer in the next patch. Hopefully there is a good balanced map that comes out that could be potentially put in with the other competition maps.
Plus no one is getting paid to develop this game you're asking a lot from the people that run Assist. You should be happy that you're still able to play this game. With that said keep up the good work and everything y'all have done is appreciated.
-
We shouldn't be changing maps we didn't make unless there is a major bug in them.
-
seems more votes for yes:)
-
I think this is a good idea. BUT i also think its less significant of a change then people think.
-
Yeah it would only completely change how the map is played. Totally an insignificant change. Fuckin idiot.
hahah oh mans what would we do without you
-
rigged voting by crook admins, I bet they helped cover up 2pacs fatal shooting by elvis presly. black helicopters and dark vans mother fuckers google it
Talking with AJ again?
-
No, if I would ever mention Tupac's death I'd suggest how he was murdered by the same collective body that murdered so many other people; ie. Michael Jackson
-
Instead of pressing your E button you stand someplace. WOW big diff. If your good at this game it doesn't make a difference at all. If your terrible and cant hear jack shit coming when your taking an objective then SURE its gunna make your life easier.
Mans, don't be a chump, trollin behind your computer screen makes you look weak.
-
Instead of pressing your E button you stand someplace. WOW big diff.
Maybe you don't realize that a radius can be set so you can be ANYWHERE inside a building, taking the objective. That doesn't change gameplay at all?
-
Instead of pressing your E button you stand someplace. WOW big diff. If your good at this game it doesn't make a difference at all. If your terrible and cant hear jack shit coming when your taking an objective then SURE its gunna make your life easier.
Mans, don't be a chump, trollin behind your computer screen makes you look weak.
not being able to hear doesnt make you terrible lol. It could mean you dont have a great sound card for the game or it could mean you didnt tweak your shit in the ini. I hate how much this game depends on sound.
-
I hate how much people this game depends tweaking on sound.
Fixed.
-
Of course it changes gameplay. I never said it didn't change gameplay. I said (and you can see it in my above post) that its not as significant as you think.
Take West objective on urban assault for example. You can already be almost anywhere in the room taking the obj. The only advantage now is that whoever is inside has the first shot.
If your going to make the radius ridiculously large you would have to adjust the time accordingly.
maxbulldog: You act like it's hard to have half decent sound. Its not. I don't have any ini tweaks, and i currently don't use my xfi to play. I have 100 dollar (because its wireless) USB headset.
-
I never said its hard to have good sound. I said i hate how much this game depends on sound. They were shooting for realistic in this game and they definitely failed in that department.
-
I never said its hard to have good sound. I said i hate how much this game depends on sound. They were shooting for realistic in this game and they definitely failed in that department.
now now, i never said that you stated it was hard. i said "You act like its hard".
Read more carefully.
They worked within the confines on unreal 2 to do the best they could. Don't hate on the game.
-
I have 100 dollar (because its wireless) USB headset.
(https://aao25.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.memegenerator.net%2Finstances%2F400x%2F22364366.jpg&hash=2b8b9b34eefac73632c3e177a8661d73)
-
now now, i never said that you stated it was hard. i said "You act like its hard".
Read more carefully.
They worked within the confines on unreal 2 to do the best they could. Don't hate on the game.
well in regards to sound i am gonna hate on the game because it sucks lol.
-
It sounds pretty nice when you can hear it all. LOLOLOLOL
JKJK it actually sounds like shit when you can hear it all.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ccoj5lhLmSQ