AAO25.com

America's Army => Anti-Cheat => Ban Appeals => Topic started by: cleaner on Sunday, January 25, 2015, 21:27:33 PM

Title: ban appeal
Post by: cleaner on Sunday, January 25, 2015, 21:27:33 PM
Required Information,
- Player Name - cleaner
- Battletracker ID - http://battletracker.com/playerstats/aao/845805/cleaner/ (http://battletracker.com/playerstats/aao/845805/cleaner/)
- Reason - private hack.
i dont know if this was a targeted ban but please show some kind of viable evidence and i will gladly quit this game once and for all.
Clear me or crucify me.
Title: Re: ban appeal
Post by: Alex on Sunday, January 25, 2015, 21:31:01 PM
please show some kind of viable evidence and i will gladly quit this game once and for all.
This seems like a rather odd thing for someone who claims they're innocent to say...
Title: Re: ban appeal
Post by: cleaner on Sunday, January 25, 2015, 21:44:58 PM
Ok so then a rage ban is what it was.
Since as far as i know you guys dont ban players without proof.
please show it and if its real ill quit
i dont need to be flamed
Title: Re: ban appeal
Post by: Alex on Sunday, January 25, 2015, 21:53:09 PM
Ok so then a rage ban is what it was.
Since as far as i know you guys dont ban players without proof.
please show it and if its real ill quit
i dont need to be flamed
I apologize for Bollie's post, normal members aren't supposed to post in ban appeals. As for my post, I wasn't flaming at all.
I'm waiting for Eliz, the admin that banned you, to post. He banned you, he will explain why. I just thought the way you worded your post was odd for someone who supposedly did nothing wrong. Volunteering to quit the game if there's evidence isn't exactly a typical ban appeal move.
Also, I'm not sure how you can call it a "rage ban" when I doubt you've ever played with the person that issued your ban.
Title: Re: ban appeal
Post by: cleaner on Sunday, January 25, 2015, 21:59:04 PM
I apologize for Bollie's post, normal members aren't supposed to post in ban appeals. As for my post, I wasn't flaming at all.
I'm waiting for Eliz, the admin that banned you, to post. He banned you, he will explain why. I just thought the way you worded your post was odd for someone who supposedly did nothing wrong. Volunteering to quit the game if there's evidence isn't exactly a typical ban appeal move.

I said that because: If its a targeted ban then in that case i will simply be forced to quit regardless of it being true or false simply because of power difference.
Title: Re: ban appeal
Post by: Spanky on Monday, January 26, 2015, 00:03:51 AM
Looking at the information for your ban, there's evidence that something was loaded into America's Army that was accessing information in the game and then rendering it on the screen. I'm not the one that's knowledgeable about that kind of stuff but there's enough information there that convinces me that something wasn't right.
Title: Re: ban appeal
Post by: cleaner on Monday, January 26, 2015, 00:33:14 AM
Looking at the information for your ban, there's evidence that something was loaded into America's Army that was accessing information in the game and then rendering it on the screen. I'm not the one that's knowledgeable about that kind of stuff but there's enough information there that convinces me that something wasn't right.

Ok so for almost the year i played this game with you guys same k/d as always and if the whole time i had something loaded into the game that was rendering stuff on the screen wouldnt the infamous assist anti cheat pick it up? how is it any different now? i still think this is just a rage/targeted ban with no proof whatsoever.
also if ur not knowlegable in this stuff why say it?
Title: Re: ban appeal
Post by: ELiZ on Monday, January 26, 2015, 00:48:54 AM
As mentioned before we have proof that you had something loaded that hooked into the AA process.
Does HookingTools.cpp sound familiar?

I think you are better of play AVA, right?

I'll let this thread open a while longer, but appeal denied.
Title: Re: ban appeal
Post by: cleaner on Monday, January 26, 2015, 03:30:11 AM
doesnt sound familiar at all.
ok.